DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Greenleaf v. Egan, 15 N.W. 254.

28 citing documents.

  • Rognrud v. Zubert 165 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1969
  • Rognrud v. Zubert 165 N.W.2d 244 Minn. 1969
    See, Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren, 130 Minn. 252 , ; Koeper v. Town of Louisville, 109 Minn. 519 , ; Greenleaf v. Egan, 30 Minn. 316 , .
  • Pump-It, Inc. v. Alexander 42 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1950
  • Pump-It, Inc. v. Alexander 42 N.W.2d 337 Minn. 1950
    Cf. Greenleaf v. Egan, 30 Minn. 316 , ; Norton v. Duluth Transfer Ry.
  • Swanson v. Alworth 209 N.W. 907 Minn. 1926
  • Swanson v. Alworth 209 N.W. 907 Minn. 1926
    Greenleaf v. Egan, 30 Minn. 316 , ; Bond v. Welcome, 61 Minn. 43 , ; Nordeen v. Buck, 79 Minn. 352 , ; Shipley v. Bolduc, 93 Minn. 414 , ; Williams v. Howes, 137 Minn. 462 , ; King v. International L. Co. 156 Minn. 494 , .
  • Mannheimer v. Phinney 209 N.W. 7 Minn. 1926
  • Mannheimer v. Phinney 209 N.W. 7 Minn. 1926
    See Dye v. Forbes, 34 Minn. 13 , ; Greenleaf v. Egan, 30 Minn. 316 , ; Kenaston v. Lorig, 81 Minn. 454 , ; Lovering v. Webb Pub.
  • Holland Piano Manufacturing Co. v. Smith 192 N.W. 355 Minn. 1923
  • Holland Piano Manufacturing Co. v. Smith 192 N.W. 355 Minn. 1923
    Greenleaf v. Egan, 30 Minn. 316 , ; Judd v. Dike, 30 Minn. 380 , .
  • Williams v. Howes 162 N.W. 1049 Minn. 1917
  • Williams v. Howes 162 N.W. 1049 Minn. 1917
    Greenleaf v. Eagan, 30 Minn. 316 , ; Bond v. Welcome, 61 Minn. 43 , ; Nordeen v. Buck, 79 Minn. 352 , ; Shipley v. Bolduc, 93 Minn. 414 , .
  • Tuder v. Oregon Short Line Railroad 155 N.W. 200 Minn. 1915
  • Tuder v. Oregon Short Line Railroad 155 N.W. 200 Minn. 1915
    As said in Greenleaf v. Egan, 30 Minn. 316 , : “When the proofs make out, within the allegations of the complaint, a cause of action, legal or equitable, though it be not of the character given it by the entire complaint, the plaintiff has a right that the cause be retained and tried and the proper relief upon the facts proved administered.” In or
  • Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren 153 N.W. 527 Minn. 1915
  • Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. Sodergren 153 N.W. 527 Minn. 1915
    Greenleaf v. Egan, 30 Minn. 316 , .
  • Levine v. Lancashire Insurance 68 N.W. 855 Minn. 1896
  • Levine v. Lancashire Insurance 68 N.W. 855 Minn. 1896
    See Greenleaf v. Egan, 30 Minn. 316 , ; Lace v. Fixen, 39 Minn. 46 , ; Peterson v. Ruhnke, 46 Minn. 115 , ; Smith v. Barclay, 54 Minn. 47 , .
  • Peterson v. Ruhnke 48 N.W. 768 Minn. 1891
  • Peterson v. Ruhnke 48 N.W. 768 Minn. 1891
    762 ;) Greenleaf v. Egan, 30 Minn. 316 , ( 15 N. W. Rep.
  • Lace v. Fixen 38 N.W. 762 Minn. 1888
  • Lace v. Fixen 38 N.W. 762 Minn. 1888
    Greenleaf v. Egan, 30 Minn. 316 , ( 15 N. W. Rep.
  • Chadbourne v. Zilsdorf 24 N.W. 308 Minn. 1885
  • Chadbourne v. Zilsdorf 24 N.W. 308 Minn. 1885
    Berry, J. Like Greenleaf v. Egan, 30 Minn. 316 , tbis action is, upon the pleadings, one in which legal and equitable causes of action •are united, and therefore one in which some of the issues were triable by a jury, and some by the court.
  • Bausman v. Woodman 24 N.W. 198 Minn. 1885
  • Bausman v. Woodman 24 N.W. 198 Minn. 1885
    rprise to be prosecuted for the benefit of both, and that out of the prosecution of this enterprise either mutual accounts or accounts on one side, with reference to which a material discovery is asked, or both, have arisen, which either party' has a right to have “fairly and fully adjusted and settled according to the provisions of the contract.” Garner v. Reis, 25 Minn. 475 ; Greenleaf v. Egan, 30 Minn. 316 ; 1 Story, Eq.
  • Bohrer v. Drake 23 N.W. 840 Minn. 1885
  • Bohrer v. Drake 23 N.W. 840 Minn. 1885