Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Evans v. Winona, Lumber Co., 16 N.W. 404.

25 citing documents.

Patrick Finn and Lighthouse Management Group, Inc., Appellants/Cross-Respondents v. Alliance Bank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, Home Federal Bank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, KleinBank, Respondent/Cross-Appellant, … 860 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 2015
McMillan v. Cheeny, 30 Minn. 519, 521, 16 N.W. 404, 405 (1883).
Borchardt v. Kulick 48 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1951
Borchardt v. Kulick 48 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1951
Rowell v. City of Minneapolis 264 N.W. 692 Minn. 1936
1927, § 9191(6); McMillan v. Cheeney, 30 Minn. 519 , ; Brasie v. Minneapolis Brg.
State v. Tupa 260 N.W. 875 Minn. 1935
McMillan v. Cheeney, 30 Minn. 519 , ; West v. Hennessey, 58 Minn. 133 , .
Whitcomb v. Wright 223 N.W. 294 Minn. 1929
McMillan v. Cheeney, 30 Minn. 519 , ; Brasie v. Minneapolis Brg.
Oxborough v. St. Martin 210 N.W. 854 Minn. 1926
Oxborough v. St. Martin 210 N.W. 854 Minn. 1926
Co. 30 Minn. 515 , ; Finch v. Moore, 50 Minn. 116 , ; Steele v. Anheuser-Busch Br.
Fisher v. Heller 207 N.W. 498 Minn. 1926
Fisher v. Heller 207 N.W. 498 Minn. 1926
Halloran v. Jacob Schmidt Brewing Co. 162 N.W. 1082 Minn. 1917
Halloran v. Jacob Schmidt Brewing Co. 162 N.W. 1082 Minn. 1917
Kriger v. Leppel, 42 Minn. 6 , ; Evans v. Winona Lumber Co. 30 Minn. 515 , .
Ferrier v. McCabe 152 N.W. 734 Minn. 1915
McMillan v. Cheeney, 30 Minn. 519 , ; West v. Hennessey, 58 Minn. 133 , .
Denison v. Sawyer 104 N.W. 305 Minn. 1905
Denison v. Sawyer 104 N.W. 305 Minn. 1905
Evans v. Winona Lumber Co., 30 Minn. 515 , ; Steele v. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Assn., 57 Minn. 18 , .
Goodwin v. Clover 98 N.W. 322 Minn. 1904
Goodwin v. Clover 98 N.W. 322 Minn. 1904
Evans v. Winona Lumber Co., 30 Minn. 515 , .
Brasie v. Minneapolis Brewing Co. 92 N.W. 340 Minn. 1902
McMillan v. Cheeney, 30 Minn. 519 , ; Duxbury v. Boice, 70 Minn. 113 , .
Spinney v. Hill 84 N.W. 116 Minn. 1900
Spinney v. Hill 84 N.W. 116 Minn. 1900
Evans v. Winona L. Co., 30 Minn. 515 , ; Finch v. Moore, 50 Minn. 116 , ; Steele v. Anheuser-Busch Br.
Jorgenson v. Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. 67 N.W. 364 Minn. 1896
We need not stop to inquire where this would leave the company, which attached the land as Oskerson’s property, if it were true, for the claim of counsel was considered and disposed of in McMillan v. Cheeney, 30 Minn. 519 , , wherein it was held that the common-law rule and the statutory rule (section 5534, supra) forbidding con *491 veyances of real estate between husband and wife referred only to conveyances from one to the other directly, and not to indirect conveyances through third parties;
Steele v. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'n 58 N.W. 685 Minn. 1894
Steele v. Anheuser-Busch Brewing Ass'n 58 N.W. 685 Minn. 1894
By entering on and occupying the premises the defendant became tenant of the plaintiffs, and, as held in Evans v. Winona Lumber Co., 30 Minn. 515 , ( ,) the writing, though void as a lease, regulated the terms of the tenancy as respects the rent.
Johnson v. Albertson 53 N.W. 642 Minn. 1892
Johnson v. Albertson 53 N.W. 642 Minn. 1892
It may be well to observe that, in deference to the authorities on the subject, this court (but evidently with-great reluctance) held in Evans v. Winona Lumber Co., 30 Minn. 515 , (16 N. W. Rep, 404,) that, where á tenant entered into possession under a void lease, it regulated the terms of the tenancy as respects rent.