Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Herrick v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co., 16 N.W. 413.

38 citing documents.

State v. Castillo-Alvarez 836 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 2013
State v. Castillo-Alvarez 836 N.W.2d 527 Minn. 2013
Co., 31 Minn. 11, 13 , 16 N.W.
Davis v. Furlong 328 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1983
Davis v. Furlong 328 N.W.2d 150 Minn. 1983
Co., 31 Minn. 11,13 , 16 N.W.
Allen v. Nessler 76 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1956
Allen v. Nessler 76 N.W.2d 793 Minn. 1956
Co. 31 Minn. 11 , , did not involve the question of survivability.
Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 24 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 1946
Anderson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 24 N.W.2d 836 Minn. 1946
Co. 31 Minn. 11, 13 , , 47 Am.
Kyle v. Kyle 297 N.W. 744 Minn. 1941
Kyle v. Kyle 297 N.W. 744 Minn. 1941
Chubbuck v. Holloway 234 N.W. 314 Minn. 1931
Chubbuck v. Holloway 234 N.W. 314 Minn. 1931
Co. 31 Minn. 11 , 16 N.W.
Boright v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. 230 N.W. 457 Minn. 1930
Boright v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. 230 N.W. 457 Minn. 1930
Co. 31 Minn. 11 , , 47 Am.
Erving v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. 214 N.W. 12 Minn. 1927
Erving v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co. 214 N.W. 12 Minn. 1927
Co. 31 Minn. 11 , , 47 Am.
State ex rel. Bossung v. District Court of Hennepin County 168 N.W. 589 Minn. 1918
State ex rel. Bossung v. District Court of Hennepin County 168 N.W. 589 Minn. 1918
Co. 31 Minn. 11 , , a pioneer case, it was held that a cause of action occurring in Iowa, making a railroad liable to its employees for injuries sustained through the negligence of coemployees, would be enforced in this state, though at that time we had no railway fellow-servant act and for an injury in this state there
Johnson v. Nelson 150 N.W. 620 Minn. 1915
Johnson v. Nelson 150 N.W. 620 Minn. 1915
Co. 31 Minn. 11 , , 47 Am.
Bond v. Pennsylvania Railroad 144 N.W. 942 Minn. 1914
Bond v. Pennsylvania Railroad 144 N.W. 942 Minn. 1914
Co. 31 Minn. 11 , , 47 Am.
Powell v. Great Northern Railway Co. 113 N.W. 1017 Minn. 1907
Powell v. Great Northern Railway Co. 113 N.W. 1017 Minn. 1907
Co., 31 Minn. 11 , , 47 Am.
Negaubauer v. Great Northern Railway Co. 99 N.W. 620 Minn. 1904
Negaubauer v. Great Northern Railway Co. 99 N.W. 620 Minn. 1904
Co., 31 Minn. 11 , ; Nicholas v. Burlington, C. R. & N. Ry.
Nicholas v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co. 80 N.W. 776 Minn. 1899
Nicholas v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co. 80 N.W. 776 Minn. 1899
Myers v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 72 N.W. 694 Minn. 1897
Myers v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 72 N.W. 694 Minn. 1897
Act, *478 § 195; Herrick v. Minneapolis, 31 Minn. 11 , ; Dennick v. Railroad, 103 U. S. 11 .
Midland Co. v. Broat 52 N.W. 972 Minn. 1892
Midland Co. v. Broat 52 N.W. 972 Minn. 1892
Co., 31 Minn. 11 , ( 16 N. W. Rep.
State ex rel. McCue v. Sheriff of Ramsey County 51 N.W. 112 Minn. 1892
State ex rel. McCue v. Sheriff of Ramsey County 51 N.W. 112 Minn. 1892
Co., 31 Minn. 11 , ( 16 N. W. Rep.
Lavallee v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. 41 N.W. 974 Minn. 1889
Lavallee v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. 41 N.W. 974 Minn. 1889
Co., 31 Minn. 11 , ( 16 N. W. Rep.
Herrick v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. 21 N.W. 471 Minn. 1884
Followed Herrick v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. 21 N.W. 471 Minn. 1884
other points raised are identical with those decided by this court on the former appeal, (see 31 Minn. 11 ,) and we adhere to that decision.