Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In re Snell, 16 N.W. 692.

32 citing documents.

State v. Florence 239 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1976
State v. Florence 239 N.W.2d 892 Minn. 1976
Delevan v. Justus, 85 Minn. 114 , State v. Hayden, 35 Minn. 283 , In re Snell, 31 Minn. 110
State v. Clark 134 N.W.2d 857 Minn. 1965
State v. Clark 134 N.W.2d 857 Minn. 1965
Krinkie v. Felix, 171 Minn. 140 , ; In re Snell, 31 Minn. 110 ; .
State Ex Rel. Hastings v. Bailey 116 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1962
State Ex Rel. Hastings v. Bailey 116 N.W.2d 548 Minn. 1962
Krinkie v. Felix, 171 Minn. 140 , ; In re Snell, 31 Minn. 110 , .
Wojahn v. Halter 39 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 1949
Wojahn v. Halter 39 N.W.2d 545 Minn. 1949
State v. Grant, 10 Minn. 22 (39); In re Snell, 31 Minn. 110 , .
State Ex Rel. Dufault v. Utecht 19 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1945
State Ex Rel. Dufault v. Utecht 19 N.W.2d 706 Minn. 1945
In an early Minnesota case, In re Snell, 31 Minn. 110 , , this court held that *448 a decision of one court or officer upon a writ of habeas corpus, refusing to discharge a prisoner, was not a bar to the issuance of another writ, based upon the same state of facts as the former writ, by another court or officer, or to a hearing or discharge thereupon.
State Ex Rel. Jeffrey v. Tessmer 300 N.W. 7 Minn. 1941
State Ex Rel. Jeffrey v. Tessmer 300 N.W. 7 Minn. 1941
In re Snell, 31 Minn. 110 , .
Gudbrandsen v. Pelto 287 N.W. 116 Minn. 1939
Gudbrandsen v. Pelto 287 N.W. 116 Minn. 1939
The term is employed with this meaning in the statute requiring a committing magistrate to hold the accused to answer if probable cause be shown that the accused committed the offense charged, In re Snell, 31 Minn. 110 , ; and in determining the existence of probable cause for the institution of a prosecution in an action for malicious prosecution, Smith v. Munch, 65 Minn. 256 , ; and of an arrest in an action for false imprisonment, Nelson v. Halvorson, 117 Minn. 255 , , Ann. Cas.
State Ex Rel. Shapiro v. Wall 244 N.W. 811 Minn. 1932
State Ex Rel. Shapiro v. Wall 244 N.W. 811 Minn. 1932
In re Snell, 31 Minn. 110 , .
State Ex Rel. Degen v. Freeman 210 N.W. 14 Minn. 1926
State Ex Rel. Degen v. Freeman 210 N.W. 14 Minn. 1926
*377 The case of In re Snell, 31 Minn. 110 , , and like cases, cited by the respondent, are not in point to the contrary of the conclusion we reach.
State ex rel. Hinrichs v. Lockwood 193 N.W. 113 Minn. 1923
State ex rel. Hinrichs v. Lockwood 193 N.W. 113 Minn. 1923
The rule adopted in the case of In re Snell, 31 Minn. 110 , , followed in other like cases, does not apply, for in such case the writ of certiorari is limited to the purpose of bringing up matters of record obtainable in aid of the habeas corpus proceeding in no other *267 way; an exceptional situation not bere presented.
State ex rel. Graves v. Haugen 145 N.W. 167 Minn. 1914
State ex rel. Graves v. Haugen 145 N.W. 167 Minn. 1914
In re Snell, 31 Minn. 110 , ; State v. Hayden, 35 Minn. 283 , ; State v. Justus, 85 Minn. 114 , .
State ex rel. Bales v. Bailey 118 N.W. 676 Minn. 1908
State ex rel. Bales v. Bailey 118 N.W. 676 Minn. 1908
validity thereof from matters de hors the record, except in those cases where the evidence is brought up on certiorari as ancillary to the writ of habeas corpus as in the case of In re Snell, 31 Minn. 110 , .
State ex rel. Delevan v. Justus 88 N.W. 415 Minn. 1901
State ex rel. Delevan v. Justus 88 N.W. 415 Minn. 1901
In re Snell, 31 Minn. 110 , ; State v. Hayden, 35 Minn. 283 , .
State ex rel. Lacy v. Norby 72 N.W. 703 Minn. 1897
State ex rel. Lacy v. Norby 72 N.W. 703 Minn. 1897
The cases of In re Snell, 31 Minn. 110 , , and State v. Hayden, 35 Minn. 283 , , in which the evidence given on the hearing before the committing magistrate was reviewed on *453 habeas corpus, are not in point, for they were cases where the petitioners were held, not by process issued upon final judgments, but to await the action
State ex rel. Lembke v. Bechdel 34 N.W. 334 Minn. 1887
State ex rel. Lembke v. Bechdel 34 N.W. 334 Minn. 1887
Mitchell, J. 1 In Re Snell, 31 Minn. 110 , ( 16 N. W. Rep.
State v. Hayden 28 N.W. 659 Minn. 1886
State v. Hayden 28 N.W. 659 Minn. 1886
In re Snell, 31 Minn. 110 , ( 16 N. W. Rep.