cl-8009502
Precedential
Affirmed
Processed
Goetz v. School-District No. 59
Cited by
- State Ex Rel. Burnquist v. Welter 296 N.W. 582 Minn. 1941
- State Ex Rel. Peterson v. Hoppe 260 N.W. 215 Minn. 1935
- State ex rel. Kohlman v. Wagener 153 N.W. 749 Minn. 1915
- Dahlsten v. Anderson 109 N.W. 697 Minn. 1906
- Moon v. Allen 84 N.W. 654 Minn. 1900
- Glass v. St. Paul Park Carriage & Sleigh Co. 45 N.W. 150 Minn. 1890
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Ryan v. School-District No. 13 27 Minn. 433
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Morrison 23 Minn. 308
- Folsom v. County of Chisago 28 Minn. 324
Opinion text
By the Court. The allegation in the complaint that the plaintiff was “a duly qualified teacher of and in the public schools of the state, ” includes the fact that he had received the certificate required by the statute, for without that fact he could not be a duly qualified teacher. The complaint differs from, that in Ryan v. School-District, 27 Minn. 433 , in which there was no allegation of the receipt of the certificate, nor of any fact which included or was equivalent to the allegation of that fact. See Minn. & St. L. Ry. Co. v. Morrison, 23 Minn. 308 ; Folsom v. County of Chisago, 28 Minn. 324 . Order affirmed.