Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Little v. Willford, 17 N.W. 282.

26 citing documents.

Consolidated School District No. 102 v. Walter 66 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1954
Consolidated School District No. 102 v. Walter 66 N.W.2d 881 Minn. 1954
Schaeffer v. Newberry, 227 Minn. 259 , 35 N. W. (2d) 287 ; Little v. Willford, 31 Minn. 173 , .
State v. Lahiff 45 N.W.2d 807 Minn. 1951
Minnesota Valley Gun Club v. Northline Corporation 290 N.W. 222 Minn. 1940
Minnesota Valley Gun Club v. Northline Corporation 290 N.W. 222 Minn. 1940
§ 5576, and cases, or by his death, see Little v. Willford, 31 Minn. 173 , .
Longcor v. City of Red Wing 289 N.W. 570 Minn. 1940
Longcor v. City of Red Wing 289 N.W. 570 Minn. 1940
were enacted expressly authorizing charitable trusts, the consistent holding of this court was that such a trust could not be created either as to real, Little v. Willford, 31 Minn. 173 , , or personal property, In re Estate of Ford, 144 Minn. 454 , ; Shanahan v. Kelly, 88 Minn. 202 , .
St. Paul Trust Co. v. United States Cereal Co. 206 N.W. 385 Minn. 1925
St. Paul Trust Co. v. United States Cereal Co. 206 N.W. 385 Minn. 1925
The plain actuality is, not that it remained personal property, but only that the vendor had the contract right by severance to retake it and so “reconvert it into personalty.” Little v. Willford, 31 Minn. 173 (179), .
Congdon v. Congdon 200 N.W. 76 Minn. 1924
Congdon v. Congdon 200 N.W. 76 Minn. 1924
But since that time it has been assumed in the cases cited [German Land Assn. v. Scholler, 10 Minn. 260 (331); Little v. Willford, 31 Minn. 173 , ; Atwater v. Russell, 49 Minn. 57 , , ; Lane v. Eaton, 69 Minn. 141 , ] in support of the rule, that all trusts in both real and personal property were abolished, except *367 as authorized by the statute.
Northwestern Lumber & Wrecking Co. v. Parker 145 N.W. 964 Minn. 1914
Northwestern Lumber & Wrecking Co. v. Parker 145 N.W. 964 Minn. 1914
491; Little v. Willford, 31 Minn. 173 , ; Stont v. Stoppel, 30 Minn. 56 , ; Case Mnfg.
Watkins v. Bigelow 100 N.W. 1104 Minn. 1904
Watkins v. Bigelow 100 N.W. 1104 Minn. 1904
German Land Assn. v. Scholler, 10 Minn. 260 (331); Little v. Willford, 31 Minn. 173 , ; Atwater v. Russell, 49 Minn. 57 , , ; Lane v. Eaton, 69 Minn. 141 , ; Shanahan v. Kelly, 88 Minn. 202 , .
Shanahan v. Kelly 92 N.W. 948 Minn. 1903
Shanahan v. Kelly 92 N.W. 948 Minn. 1903
German Land Assn. v. Scholler, 10 Minn. 260 (331); Little v. Willford, 31 Minn. 173 , ; Atwater v. Russell, 49 Minn. 57 , , ; Lane v. Eaton, 69 Minn. 141 , .
State ex rel. Olsen v. Board of Control of State Institutions 88 N.W. 533 Minn. 1902
Lane v. Eaton 71 N.W. 1031 Minn. 1897
Lane v. Eaton 71 N.W. 1031 Minn. 1897
the result at which we have arrived in conflict with Little v. Willford, 31 Minn. 173 , .
Merchants' National Bank of Crookston v. Stanton 56 N.W. 821 Minn. 1893
Merchants' National Bank of Crookston v. Stanton 56 N.W. 821 Minn. 1893
This-seems to us a reasonable doctrine, and one supported by the authorities, although we admit that in all the cases we have examined, including our own case of Little v. Willford, 31 Minn. 173 , ( 17 N. W. Rep.
Althen v. Tarbox 50 N.W. 1018 Minn. 1892
Althen v. Tarbox 50 N.W. 1018 Minn. 1892
See Little v. Willford, 31 Minn. 173 , ( 17 N. W. Rep.
Ingalls v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. 40 N.W. 524 Minn. 1888
Ingalls v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. 40 N.W. 524 Minn. 1888
In accordance with the general current of authorities, this court in Little v. Willford, 31 Minn. 173 , ( 17 N. W. Rep.