cl-8009506 Precedential Reversed Processed

Harris Manufacturing Co. v. Anfinson

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed October 22, 1883 · 17 N.W. 274

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Opinion text

By the Court. This case is ruled by Johnston Harvester Co. v. Clark, 30 Minn. 308 , in which we held a stipulation (contained in a machine note) for the payment of an attorney’s fee in case of suit, valid. By consequence it would not be usurious. In White v. Iltis, 24 Minn. 43, the court was of opinion that the interest clause was so peculiarly worded as to include the attorney’s fee mentioned, not simply as an attorney’s fee, but as interest. Order reversed, and new trial ordered.