Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite County of Olmsted v. Barber, 17 N.W. 473.

30 citing documents.

Reiser v. Commissioner of Revenue 369 N.W.2d 2 Minn. 1985
Reiser v. Commissioner of Revenue 369 N.W.2d 2 Minn. 1985
See, e.g., Spratt v. Hatfield, 267 Minn. 535, 539 , County of Olmsted v. Barber, 31 Minn. 256 , 17 N.W.
Mesaba Aviation Division of Halvorson of Duluth, Inc. v. County of Itasca 258 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1977
Mesaba Aviation Division of Halvorson of Duluth, Inc. v. County of Itasca 258 N.W.2d 877 Minn. 1977
826 (1908); County of Olmsted v. Barber, 31 Minn. 256 , 17 N.W.
Wilking v. County of Chippewa 31 N.W.2d 437 Minn. 1948
Wilking v. County of Chippewa 31 N.W.2d 437 Minn. 1948
" County of Olmsted v. Barber, 31 Minn. 256 , 17 N.W.
Stammers v. Larson 171 N.W. 809 Minn. 1919
Stammers v. Larson 171 N.W. 809 Minn. 1919
County of Olmsted v. Barber, 31 Minn. 256 , ; Hartman v. Weiland, 36 Minn. 223 , ; Talbot v. Barager, 37 Minn. 208 , ; Windom v. Schuppel, 39 Minn. 35 , ; Maloney v. Finnegan, 40 Minn. 281 , ; Harper v. East Side Syndicate, 40 Minn. 381 , ; Corser v. Kindred, 40 Minn. 467 , 42 N.
State ex rel. Brown v. Board of Public Works 158 N.W. 977 Minn. 1916
State ex rel. Brown v. Board of Public Works 158 N.W. 977 Minn. 1916
He may show the unauthorized insertion of taxes for past years, County of Olmsted v. Barber, 31 Minn. 256 , ; Wass v. Smith, 34 Minn. 304 , ; or the unlawful .insertion of “back” interest or penalties.
State v. McPhail 145 N.W. 108 Minn. 1914
State v. McPhail 145 N.W. 108 Minn. 1914
Bank of Faribault, 23 Minn. 280, 286 ; State v. Jones, 24 Minn. 251 ; County of Olmsted v. Barber, 31 Minn. 256 , ; In re Jefferson, 35 Minn. 215, 219 , ; State v. Stearns, 72 Minn. 200, 222 , .
State v. Foster 116 N.W. 826 Minn. 1908
State v. Foster 116 N.W. 826 Minn. 1908
County of Olmsted v. Barber, 31 Minn. 256 , ; State v. Weyerhauser, 68 Minn. 353, 371 , ; State v. Shevlin-Carpenter Co., 102 Minn. 471 , 480, , .
Minnesota Debenture Co. v. Johnson 102 N.W. 381 Minn. 1905
Minnesota Debenture Co. v. Johnson 102 N.W. 381 Minn. 1905
Brown v. Kohout, 61 Minn. 113 , ; Harper v. East Side Syndicate, 40 Minn. 381 , ; Hartman v. Weiland, 36 Minn. 223 , ; County of Olmsted v. Barber, 31 Minn. 256 , .
Schmitt v. Dahl 93 N.W. 665 Minn. 1903
Schmitt v. Dahl 93 N.W. 665 Minn. 1903
6 Minn. 223 , , it was hold that a fraudulent grantee of a farm has, as against the creditors of his grantor, title to the crops that he raises on the farm while the conveyance is unimpeached, and that, as against a stranger to it, a judgment is no evidence of the prior existence of the debt for which it was rendered; and the court referred to the case of County of Olmsted v. Barber, 31 Minn. 256 , ; but the question of what was meant by the previous existence of the debt was not there considere
State v. Weyerhauser 68 Minn. 353 Minn. 1897
State v. Weyerhauser 68 Minn. 353 Minn. 1897
County v. Barber, 31 Minn. 256 , .
Schoonover v. Galarnault 47 N.W. 654 Minn. 1891
Schoonover v. Galarnault 47 N.W. 654 Minn. 1891
County of Olmsted, v. Barber, 31 Minn. 256 , ( 17 N. W. Rep.
Bloom v. Moy 45 N.W. 715 Minn. 1890
Bloom v. Moy 45 N.W. 715 Minn. 1890
Bruggerman v. Hoerr, 7 Minn. 261 , (337;) Braley v. Byrnes, 20 Minn. 389 , (435;) County of Olmsted v. Barber, 31 Minn. 256 , ( 17 N. W. Rep.
County of Redwood v. Winona & St. Peter Land Co. 41 N.W. 465 Minn. 1889
County of Redwood v. Winona & St. Peter Land Co. 41 N.W. 465 Minn. 1889
This right to assess or reassess for back taxes, under appropriate legislation, has been fully recognized by this court in County of Olmsted v. Barber, 31 Minn. 256 , ( 17 N. W. Rep.
Hartman v. Weiland 30 N.W. 815 Minn. 1886
Hartman v. Weiland 30 N.W. 815 Minn. 1886
County of Olmsted v. Barber, 31 Minn. 256, 261 , ( 17 N. W. Rep.
Coles v. County of Washington 27 N.W. 497 Minn. 1886
Coles v. County of Washington 27 N.W. 497 Minn. 1886
State v. Cronkhite, supra; County of Olmsted v. Barber, 31 Minn. 256 , ( 17 N. W. Rep.