Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kipp v. Dawson, 17 N.W. 961.
- Coffin v. Estes 20 N.W. 357 Minn. 1884
-
Coffin v. Estes
20 N.W. 357
Minn. 1884
But this point was disposed of in Kipp v. Dawson, 31 Minn. 373 , where it was held not to be a jurisdictional defect, and that the question of the amount of the judgment was to be determined in the proceeding in which it was rendered, and that the objection should have been taken there.