Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite King v. Minneapolis Union Railway Co., 20 N.W. 135.

31 citing documents.

State v. Harbor City Oil Co. 486 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
State v. Harbor City Oil Co. 486 N.W.2d 455 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
Co., 32 Minn. 224, 226 , 20 N.W.
State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 413 N.W.2d 514 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State Ex Rel. Spannaus v. Northwest Airlines, Inc. 413 N.W.2d 514 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
As Justice Mitchell noted in King v. Minneapolis Union Railway Co., 32 Minn. 224, 226 , 20 N.W.
Twin City Metropolitan Public Transit Area Ex Rel. Twin Cities Area Metropolitan Transit Commission v. Twin City Lines, … 224 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1974
Twin City Metropolitan Public Transit Area Ex Rel. Twin Cities Area Metropolitan Transit Commission v. Twin City Lines, … 224 N.W.2d 121 Minn. 1974
Union R. Co. 32 Minn. 224, 226 , stated the rule of damages in eminent domain proceedings which has been followed by this court for nearly a century: “* * * [A]ny evidence is competent and any fact is proper to be considered which legitimately bears upon the question of the marketable value of the property.
Independent School District No. 492 v. Waletzki 209 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 1973
Independent School District No. 492 v. Waletzki 209 N.W.2d 546 Minn. 1973
Co. 32 Minn. 224 , did not result in substantial prejudice since no request therefor was timely made and the record does not support a claim that such omission amounted to an error of fundamental law.
Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. First Avenue Realty Company, Inc. 133 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1965
Housing & Redevelopment Authority v. First Avenue Realty Company, Inc. 133 N.W.2d 645 Minn. 1965
State v. Robinson 123 N.W.2d 812 Minn. 1963
State v. Robinson 123 N.W.2d 812 Minn. 1963
Co. 32 Minn. 224 , 228 , 20 N.W.
State Ex Rel. Lord v. Malecker 120 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1963
State Ex Rel. Lord v. Malecker 120 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1963
Co. 32 Minn. 224, 226 , .
State Ex Rel. Willey v. Chun 372 P.2d 324 Ariz. 1962
State v. LaBarre 96 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1959
State v. LaBarre 96 N.W.2d 642 Minn. 1959
Co. 32 Minn. 224, 225 , , 136: “We think it may be stated as elementary that a person is entitled to the fair value of his property for any use to which it is adapted * * * whether that use be the one to which it is presently applied, or some other to which it is adapted.
STATE, BY LORD v. Red Wing Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co. 93 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 1958
STATE, BY LORD v. Red Wing Laundry & Dry Cleaning Co. 93 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 1958
Co. 32 Minn. 224, 225 , , involving the condemnation of a 99-year leasehold interest, including buddings and machinery, this court was confronted with the question “whether it was proper, in determining the value of this property, to take into account *572 the fact that there was a manufacturing business established and i
Regents of the University of Minnesota v. Irwin 57 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1953
Regents of the University of Minnesota v. Irwin 57 N.W.2d 625 Minn. 1953
Co. 32 Minn. 224, 226 , , 136: “* * * It is, we think, equally true that any evidence is competent and any fact is proper to be considered which legitimately bears upon the question of the marketable value of the property.
Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission v. Hedberg-Freidheim Co. 32 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 1948
Minneapolis-St. Paul Metropolitan Airports Commission v. Hedberg-Freidheim Co. 32 N.W.2d 569 Minn. 1948
In Re Improvement of Third Street, St. Paul 225 N.W. 92 Minn. 1929
In Re Improvement of Third Street, St. Paul 225 N.W. 92 Minn. 1929
Kafka v. Davidson 160 N.W. 1021 Minn. 1917
Kafka v. Davidson 160 N.W. 1021 Minn. 1917
Co. 32 Minn. 224 , ; Corrigan v. City of Chicago, 144 Ill.
Conan v. City of Ely 97 N.W. 737 Minn. 1903
Conan v. City of Ely 97 N.W. 737 Minn. 1903
Russell v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. 22 N.W. 379 Minn. 1885
Russell v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. 22 N.W. 379 Minn. 1885