Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. Hanft, 23 N.W. 308.

15 citing documents.

Brown v. Allstate Insurance Co. 481 N.W.2d 17 Minn. 1992
See Wagner v. Nagel, 33 Minn. 348, 350-51 , (municipal court); (conciliation court).
Brown v. Allstate Insurance Co. 466 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
619, 620 (1897); Wagner v. Nagel, 33 Minn. 348, 350-51
Midland Loan Finance Co. v. Temple Garage Co. Inc. 288 N.W. 853 Minn. 1939
Wagner v. Nagel, 33 Minn. 348 , ; Pioneer Land & Loan Co. v. Bernard, 156 Minn. 422 , .
Holland v. McGrath 248 N.W. 750 Minn. 1933
R. 279; Wagner v. Nagel, 33 Minn. 348 , .
In Re Estate of Holland 248 N.W. 750 Minn. 1933
R. 279 ; Wagner v. Nagel, 33 Minn. 348 , .
Jandrich v. Svabek 211 N.W. 957 Minn. 1927
Plummer v. Mold, 22 Minn. 15 ; Wagner v. Nagel, 33 Minn. 348, 349 , .
State ex rel. Scheffer & Rossum Co. v. Kane 174 N.W. 884 Minn. 1919
State ex rel. Scheffer & Rossum Co. v. Kane 174 N.W. 884 Minn. 1919
State v. Hanft, 32 Minn. 403 , ; State v. Olson, 56 Minn. 210 , .
Kinzel v. Boston & Duluth Farm Land Co. 145 N.W. 124 Minn. 1914
Plummer v. Mold, 22 Minn. 15 ; Wagner v. Nagel, 33 Minn. 348 , .
Lindquist v. Gibbs 142 N.W. 156 Minn. 1913
Butler v. Bohn, 31 Minn. 325 , ; Wagner v. Nagel, 33 Minn. 348 , ; Conlan v. Grace, 36 Minn. 276 , ; Coggins v. Higbie, 83 Minn. 83 , ; Fitchette v. Victoria Land Co. 93 Minn. 485 , ; Naeseth v. Hommedal, 109 Minn. 153 , ; Moriarty v. Maloney, 121 Minn. 285 , .
Theodore Wetmore & Co. v. Thurman 141 N.W. 481 Minn. 1913
Hawley v. Wilkinson, 18 Minn. 468 (525); Wagner v. Nagel, 33 Minn. 348 , ; Rhodes v. Pray, 36 Minn. 392 , ; Ingle v. Angell, 111 Minn. 63 , , 137 Am.
Noble v. Great Northern Railway Co. 94 N.W. 434 Minn. 1903
Wagner v. Nagel, 33 Minn. 348 , ; Schneider v. Ashworth, 34 Minn. 426 , ; Benjamin v. Levy, 39 Minn. 11 , ; Danahey v. Pagett, 74 Minn. 20 , .
Parker v. Bradford 71 N.W. 619 Minn. 1897
The case of Wagner v. Nagel, 33 Minn. 348 , , was an action for the recovery of money only, and the court followed the general rule that the amount claimed was the amount in controversy.
State ex rel. Wischstadt v. Olson 57 N.W. 477 Minn. 1894
State ex rel. Wischstadt v. Olson 57 N.W. 477 Minn. 1894
v. Hanft, 32 Minn. 403 , ( ;) Fall v. Moore, 45 Minn. 517 , ( .)