cl-8009722 Precedential Affirmed Processed

Security Bank v. Bell

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed November 12, 1884 · 21 N.W. 470

Cited by

Gage v. G. W. Van Dusen & Co. 194 N.W. 769 Minn. 1923
Luing v. Peterson 172 N.W. 692 Minn. 1919
Bank of Montreal v. Beecher 157 N.W. 1070 Minn. 1916
Dowagiac Manufacturing Co. v. Van Valkenburg 126 N.W. 119 Minn. 1910
West Publishing Co. v. De La Mott 116 N.W. 103 Minn. 1908
Turle v. Sargent 65 N.W. 349 Minn. 1895
Nichols & Shepard Co. v. Dedrick 63 N.W. 1110 Minn. 1895

Opinion text

By the Court. There was no conflict in the evidence as to the transaction upon which the note sued on was given, and there is no question that it showed an entire want of consideration. Order affirmed.