cl-8009734
Precedential
Granted
Processed
Carlson v. Small
Cited by
- Crosby v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 26 N.W. 225 Minn. 1886
- Jacobson v. Williams 24 N.W. 296 Minn. 1885
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Wood v. Cullen 13 Minn. 394
- 13 Minn. 398 not in our corpus
- Rheiner v. Stillwater Street Railway & Transfer Co. 29 Minn. 147
Opinion text
Gilfillan, C. J. It is apparent from the record, and seems to be assumed in the argument here, that the court below granted the new trial because, in its opinion, the verdict was not sustained by the evidence. Although we think the court might have denied the motion, the evidence certainly was not in favor of the verdict to that extent that we could, within the rule laid down in Hicks v. Stone, 13 Minn. 398 , (434,) and followed in Rheiner v. Stillwater Street Ry. Co., 29 Minn. 147 , interfere with the order of the trial court granting a new trial. Order affirmed.