cl-8009750 Precedential Dismissed Processed

Stoker v. City of Minneapolis

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed November 29, 1884

Opinion text

Gilfillan, C. J. The defendant insists that plaintiff’s own evidence showed her to have been guilty of negligence that contributed to the injury, and that the case ought, therefore, to have been dismissed on its motion. On that point the evidence made the case a very close one, but we think different minds might fairly arrive at different conclusions upon it, and that the case was properly left to the jury. Order affirmed.