Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Merrill v. Dearing, 21 N.W. 721.

26 citing documents.

State Ex Rel. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Erickson 3 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 1942
State Ex Rel. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. Erickson 3 N.W.2d 231 Minn. 1942
See Merrill v. Dearing, 32 Minn. 479, 480 , ; also Otis v. City of St.
State v. Aitkin County Farm Land Co. 284 N.W. 63 Minn. 1939
State v. Aitkin County Farm Land Co. 284 N.W. 63 Minn. 1939
(The author cites the following of our cases: Merrill v. Dearing, 32 Minn. 479 , ; State ex rel.
Northern Counties Land Co. v. Excelsior Land, Mining & Development Co. 178 N.W. 497 Minn. 1920
Northern Counties Land Co. v. Excelsior Land, Mining & Development Co. 178 N.W. 497 Minn. 1920
Fleming v. Roverud, 30 Minn. 273 , ; Merrill v. Dearing, 32 Minn. 479 , ; State v. Krahmer, 105 Minn. 422 , , 21 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Telford v. McGillis 153 N.W. 758 Minn. 1915
Telford v. McGillis 153 N.W. 758 Minn. 1915
Kipp v. Robinson, 75 Minn. 1 , ; Merrill v. Dearing, 32 Minn. 479 , ; Lawton v. Parker, 105 Minn. 102 , ; Johnson v. Fraser, 112 Minn. 126 , , ; Shine v. Olson, 110 Minn. 44 , , 19 Ann. Cas.
Johnson v. Fraser 127 N.W. 474 Minn. 1910
Johnson v. Fraser 127 N.W. 474 Minn. 1910
In Merrill v. Dearing, 32 Minn. 479 , , the tax title claimant had purchased at a tax sale made in September, 1811, and no notice of expiration for redemption had been given, as required by chapter 6, Laws 1811; and it was held that the right of redemption was governed by the law in force at the time of the sale, for the following reasons:
State ex rel. National Bond & Security Co. v. Krahmer 117 N.W. 780 Minn. 1908
State ex rel. National Bond & Security Co. v. Krahmer 117 N.W. 780 Minn. 1908
As said in Merrill v. Dearing, 32 Minn. 479 , , the statute meant that the owner’s right to redeem should continue until and for a specified number of days after the service of the notice, provided “that this redemption period shall not in all be less than three years from the date of sale.” A party asserting title in fee by virtue of a tax certifi
Roessler v. Romer 99 N.W. 800 Minn. 1904
Roessler v. Romer 99 N.W. 800 Minn. 1904
Merrill v. Dearing, 32 Minn. 479 , ; Kipp v. Johnson, 73 Minn. 34 , ; Phelps v. Powers, 90 Minn. 440 , .
Phelps v. Powers 97 N.W. 136 Minn. 1903
Phelps v. Powers 97 N.W. 136 Minn. 1903
The last clause of this notice contains the provision *441 referring to the time when the land may be redeemed — that it will expire “Sixty days after service of this notice in manner prescribed by section 37, chapter 6, Ceneral Laws of Minnesota, for the year 1877, and amendments thereto.” This was a valid notice of redemption, under the laws in forcé at the time of the sale (Merrill v. Dearing, 32 Minn. 479 , ; Kipp v. Johnson, 73 Minn. 34 , ), but not at the time when it was issued and served
Kipp v. Johnson 75 N.W. 736 Minn. 1898
Kipp v. Johnson 75 N.W. 736 Minn. 1898
Merrill v. Dearing, 32 Minn. 479 , ; Kenaston v. Great Northern Ry.
Wakefield v. Day 43 N.W. 71 Minn. 1889
Wakefield v. Day 43 N.W. 71 Minn. 1889
121 ,) following Merrill v. Dearing, 32 Minn. 479 , ( 21 N. W. Rep.
State ex rel. Western Land Ass'n v. Smith 32 N.W. 174 Minn. 1887
State ex rel. Western Land Ass'n v. Smith 32 N.W. 174 Minn. 1887
Merrill v. Dearing, 32 Minn. 479 , ( 21 N. W. Rep.
Nelson v. Central Land Co. 29 N.W. 121 Minn. 1886
Nelson v. Central Land Co. 29 N.W. 121 Minn. 1886
Merrill v. Dearing, 32 Minn. 479 , ( 21 N. W. Rep.
Gaston v. Merriam 22 N.W. 614 Minn. 1885
Gaston v. Merriam 22 N.W. 614 Minn. 1885
We have had occasion recently to consider and construe the statute in Merrill v. Dearing, 32 Minn. 479 , in which we held that this law was mandatory, and that the right of redemption did not terminate until after the required notice had been given.