Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Lindekugel v. Probate Court of Sibley County, 22 N.W. 10.

43 citing documents.

Severson v. Engbarth 135 N.W.2d 205 Minn. 1965
Severson v. Engbarth 135 N.W.2d 205 Minn. 1965
Lindekugel v. Probate Court, 33 Minn. 94 , .
Minnesota Odd Fellows Home v. Pogue 73 N.W.2d 615 Minn. 1955
Minnesota Odd Fellows Home v. Pogue 73 N.W.2d 615 Minn. 1955
Lindekugel v. Probate Court, 33 Minn. 94 , .
Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. Mullin 287 N.W. 233 Minn. 1939
Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. Mullin 287 N.W. 233 Minn. 1939
Lindekugel v. Probate Court, 33 Minn. 94 , *566 95, 96, .
State Ex Rel. Larson v. Probate Court 283 N.W. 545 Minn. 1938
State Ex Rel. Larson v. Probate Court 283 N.W. 545 Minn. 1938
Lindekugel v. Probate Court, 33 Minn. 94, 95, 96 , .
Grieger v. Meinke 272 N.W. 779 Minn. 1937
In Re Estate of Sprain 272 N.W. 779 Minn. 1937
Grieger v. Meinke 272 N.W. 779 Minn. 1937
Lindekugel v. Probate Court, 38 Minn. 94, 96 , , the same rule was followed.
In Re Estate of Sprain 272 N.W. 779 Minn. 1937
Lindekugel v. Probate Court, 33 Minn. 94 , 96 , 22 N.W.
State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Probate Court 271 N.W. 879 Minn. 1937
State Ex Rel. Nelson v. Probate Court 271 N.W. 879 Minn. 1937
Lindekugel v. Probate Court, 33 Minn. 94 , ; Farnham v. Thompson, 34 Minn. 330 , , 57 Am.
In Re Estate of Mahoney 263 N.W. 465 Minn. 1935
In Re Estate of Mahoney 263 N.W. 465 Minn. 1935
Lindekugel v. Probate Court, 33 Minn. 94 , .
Fulton v. Okes 262 N.W. 570 Minn. 1935
Fulton v. Okes 262 N.W. 570 Minn. 1935
Lindekugel v. Probate Court, 33 Minn. 94 , ; Mousseau v. Mousseau, 40 Minn. 236 , ; Wilson v. Erickson, 147 Minn. 260 , ; O’Brien v. Lien, 160 Minn. 276 , ; A. L. Goetzmann Co. v. Gazett, 172 Minn. 68 , .
Murray v. Calkins 254 N.W. 605 Minn. 1934
Murray v. Calkins 254 N.W. 605 Minn. 1934
Lindekugel v. Probate Court, 33 Minn. 94 , .
In Re Estate of Koffel 222 N.W. 68 Minn. 1928
In Re Estate of Koffel 222 N.W. 68 Minn. 1928
Lindekugel v. Probate Court, 33 Minn. 94 , ; Hurley v. Hamilton, 37 Minn. 160 , ; State ex rel.
Barnes v. Verry 218 N.W. 551 Minn. 1928
Barnes v. Verry 218 N.W. 551 Minn. 1928
Lindekugel v. Probate Court, 33 Minn. 94 , .
A. L. Goetzmann Co. v. Gazett 214 N.W. 895 Minn. 1927
A. L. Goetzmann Co. v. Gazett 214 N.W. 895 Minn. 1927
Lindekugel v. Probate Court, 33 Minn. 94 , ; Wilson v. Erickson, 147 Minn. 260 , .
O'Brien v. Lien 199 N.W. 914 Minn. 1924
O'Brien v. Lien 199 N.W. 914 Minn. 1924
State v. Probate Court of Sibley County, 33 Minn. 94 , .
Amundson v. Hanson 185 N.W. 252 Minn. 1921
Amundson v. Hanson 185 N.W. 252 Minn. 1921
In State v. Probate Court of Ramsey County, 19 Minn. 85 (117) and State v. Probate Court of Sibley County, 33 Minn. 94 , , cited by the intervener, it was held that after a sale had been confirmed by the probate court and the purchaser had paid the *292 purchase price and received his deed, it could not then he get aside by the probate court as the title had vested in the purchaser and passed out of the control of that cou
Wilson ex rel. Mitchell v. Erickson 180 N.W. 93 Minn. 1920
Wilson ex rel. Mitchell v. Erickson 180 N.W. 93 Minn. 1920
State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , ; State v. Probate Court of Sibley County, 33 Minn. 94 , ; Mousseau v. Mousseau, 40 Minn. 236 , ; Appleby v. Watkins, 95 Minn. 455 , , 5 Ann. Cas.
State ex rel. Hilton v. Probate Court 172 N.W. 902 Minn. 1919
Brown v. Strom 129 N.W. 136 Minn. 1910
Brown v. Strom 129 N.W. 136 Minn. 1910
See Cone v. Hooper, 18 Minn. 476 (531); Jacobs v. Fouse, 23 Minn. 51 ; State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , ; State v. Probate Court of Sibley County, 33 Minn. 94 , ; Wiswell v. Wiswell, 35 Minn. 371 , ; Culver v. Hardenbergh, 37 Minn. 225 , ; Reiser v. Gigrich, 59 Minn. 368 , ; Boltz v.Schutz, 61 Minn. 444 , ; Starkey v. Sweeney, 71 Minn. 241 , ; O’Brien v. Larson, 71 Minn. 371 , ; Betcher
State ex rel. Union National Bank v. Probate Court 115 N.W. 173 Minn. 1908
State ex rel. Union National Bank v. Probate Court 115 N.W. 173 Minn. 1908
In State v. Probate Court of Sibley County, 33 Minn. 94 , , it was held that after the land had been sold under an order of the probate court, the sale confirmed, the deed executed, and the administrator discharged, *328 the matter had passed out of the jurisdiction of the probate court, and it could not entertain an application to review and set aside the sale
Kurtz v. St. Paul & Duluth Railroad 67 N.W. 808 Minn. 1896
Kurtz v. St. Paul & Duluth Railroad 67 N.W. 808 Minn. 1896
State v. Probate Court of Ramsey Co., 19 Minn. 85 (117); State v. Probate Court of Sibley Co., 33 Minn. 94 , .
Mousseau v. Mousseau 41 N.W. 977 Minn. 1889
Mousseau v. Mousseau 41 N.W. 977 Minn. 1889
“No one could suppose that the court [of probate] might entertain an action by the representative to establish and enforce a debt claimed to be owing by a third person to the estate, nor to determine the right to property, real or personal.” State v. Probate Court, 33 Minn. 94 , ( 22 N. W. Rep.
Hurley v. Hamilton 33 N.W. 912 Minn. 1887
Hurley v. Hamilton 33 N.W. 912 Minn. 1887
See State v. Probate Court, 33 Minn. 94 , ( 22 N. W. Rep.