Anderson v. Knudsen
Cited by
- Conter v. Farrington 48 N.W. 1134 Minn. 1891
- McGlauflin v. Beeden 43 N.W. 86 Minn. 1889
- American Steam-Boiler Insurance v. Wilder 40 N.W. 252 Minn. 1888
- Morrison v. Philippi 28 N.W. 239 Minn. 1886
- Merriman v. Bartlett 26 N.W. 728 Minn. 1886
- Dye v. Forbes 24 N.W. 309 Minn. 1885
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- O'Neil v. St. Olaf's School 26 Minn. 329
- Clark v. Schatz 24 Minn. 300
- Rugg v. Hoover 28 Minn. 404
- Keller v. Houlihan 32 Minn. 486
Opinion text
Gilfillan, C. J. The ground upon which this action was dismissed is not tenable, as held by this court in North Star Iron Works Co. v. Strong, ante, p. 1, decided at the present term. But a right decision or determination of a case will not be reversed because made upon a wrong reason. The same disposition as was made of the case would have to be made on the ground that the complaint does not state a cause of action, and the defect is one that manifestly cannot be cured by amendment. The complaint is for a mechanic’s lien, and has attached to it, as an exhibit, a copy of the account and affidavit' filed to secure the lien. The material for which the lien is «laimed was furnished to one not the owner of the lot or building, .and the affidavit does not in any way connect him with the owner, as by a statement that he was erecting the building under a contract with him or with his consent. It fails to show prima facie a right to a lien, and is therefore fatally defective, within the rule laid down in O'Neil v.St. Olaf’s School, 26 Minn. 329 ; Clark v. Schatz, 24 Minn. 300 ; Rugg v. Hoover, 28 Minn. 404 ; and Keller v. Houlihan, 32 Minn. 486 , decided at this term. Judgment affirmed.