Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bott v. Pratt, 23 N.W. 237.

32 citing documents.

Motokazie! Inc. v. Rice County 824 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Motokazie! Inc. v. Rice County 824 N.W.2d 341 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
Paul, -82 (Minn.App.2012) (“An ordinance is commonly defined as an ‘authoritative law or decree,’ especially ‘a municipal regulation.’ ” (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 1208 (9th ed.2009))); see also Mayes v. Byers, 214 Minn. 54, 63 , (“A city ordinance within its proper scope has the force and effect of law.”); Bott v. Pratt, 33 Minn. 323, 328 , 23 N.W.
Hutchinson v. Cotton 53 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1952
Hutchinson v. Cotton 53 N.W.2d 27 Minn. 1952
Use customarily incidental to any of the above uses when located on the same lot and not involving the conduct of a business; including home occupations engaged in by the occupant of a dwelling and not involving the conduct of a business on the premises, * * 3 Section 24 of the ordinance reads as follows: 4 Bott v. Pratt, 33 Minn. 323 , .
Mayes v. Byers 7 N.W.2d 403 Minn. 1943
Mayes v. Byers 7 N.W.2d 403 Minn. 1943
Bott v. Pratt, 33 Minn. 323 , , 53 Am.
Larson v. Lowden 282 N.W. 669 Minn. 1938
Larson v. Lowden 282 N.W. 669 Minn. 1938
Bott v. Pratt, 33 Minn. 323 , , 53 Am.
Kaiser v. Butchart 274 N.W. 680 Minn. 1937
Kaiser v. Butchart 274 N.W. 680 Minn. 1937
Bott v. Pratt, 33 Minn. 323 , , 53 Am.
Martin v. Tracy 246 N.W. 6 Minn. 1932
Martin v. Tracy 246 N.W. 6 Minn. 1932
The principle was discussed in an early case, Bott v. Pratt, 33 Minn. 323 , , 53 Am.
Mechler v. McMahon 239 N.W. 605 Minn. 1931
Mechler v. McMahon 239 N.W. 605 Minn. 1931
Mechler v. McMahon 239 N.W. 605 Minn. 1931
Bott v. Pratt, 33 Minn. 323 , , 53 Am.
Mechler v. McMahon 239 N.W. 605 Minn. 1931
Bott v. Pratt, 33 Minn. 323 , 23 N.W.
Schaar v. Conforth 151 N.W. 275 Minn. 1915
Schaar v. Conforth 151 N.W. 275 Minn. 1915
Co. 40 Minn. 350 , , where a train was run at a rate of speed forbidden by statute; Bott v. Pratt, 33 Minn. 323 , , 53 Am.
Sullivan v. Minneapolis & Rainy River Railway Co. 142 N.W. 3 Minn. 1913
Sullivan v. Minneapolis & Rainy River Railway Co. 142 N.W. 3 Minn. 1913
1912A 51; Baxter v. Coughlin, 70 Minn. 1, 4 , ; Bott v. Pratt, 33 Minn. 323, 326 , , 53 Am.
Meshbesher v. Channellene Oil & Manufacturing Co. 119 N.W. 428 Minn. 1909
Meshbesher v. Channellene Oil & Manufacturing Co. 119 N.W. 428 Minn. 1909
Bott v. Pratt, 33 Minn. 323 , , 53 Am.
Anderson v. Settergren 111 N.W. 279 Minn. 1907
Anderson v. Settergren 111 N.W. 279 Minn. 1907
698; Bott v. Pratt, 33 Minn. 323 , , 53 Am.
Baxter v. Coughlin 72 N.W. 797 Minn. 1897
Baxter v. Coughlin 72 N.W. 797 Minn. 1897
Law, §§ 132-141; Cooley, Torts, 780; Bott v. Pratt, 33 Minn. 323 , ; Osborne v. McMasters, 40 Minn. 103 , .
Buckley v. Humason 52 N.W. 385 Minn. 1892
Buckley v. Humason 52 N.W. 385 Minn. 1892
Bott v. Pratt, 33 Minn. 323 , ( 23 N. W. Rep.
Dugan v. St. Paul & Duluth Railroad 42 N.W. 538 Minn. 1889
Dugan v. St. Paul & Duluth Railroad 42 N.W. 538 Minn. 1889
320 ;) Bott v. Pratt, 33 Minn. 323 , ( 23 N. W. Rep.
Osborne v. McMasters 41 N.W. 543 Minn. 1889
Osborne v. McMasters 41 N.W. 543 Minn. 1889
In support of this we need only cite our own decision in Bott v. Pratt, 33 Minn. 323 , ( 23 N. W. Rep.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by