Cited by

Jensen v. Crevier, 33 Minn. 372, 373 , ; Crosby v. Farmer, 39 Minn. 305 , ; Knutson v. Davies, 51 Minn. 363, 364 , ; *317 Allen v. McIntyre, 56 Minn. 351 , .

Jensen v. Crevier, 33 Minn. 372 , ; Vaule v. Miller, 69 Minn. 440 , ; Kueffner v. Gottfried, 154 Minn. 70 , .

To overcome its effect as prima facie evidence, the proofs must be “clear and satisfactory,” Jensen v. Crevier, 33 Minn. 372 , ; Allen v. McIntyre, 56 Minn. 351 , ; Lunschen v. Peterson, 120 Minn. 288 , ; “clear and practically conclusive,” Vaule v. Miller, 69 Minn. 440 , ; “positive, satisfactory and convincing,” Osman v. Wisted, 78 Minn. 295 , ; “unequivocal, clear and co

Jensen v. Crevier, 33 Minn. 372 , ; Coles v. Berryhill, 37 Minn. 56, .

This instruction is conceded to be correct by appellant, and in accord with the rulings of the court in Jensen v. Crevier, 33 Minn. 372 , ; Allen v. McIntyre, 56 Minn. 351 , ; Knutson v. Davies, 51 Minn. 363 , , and Vaule v. Miller, 69 Minn. 440 , .

Hodge v. Twitchell, 33 Minn. 389 , .

Jensen v. Crevier, 33 Minn. 372 , .

Jensen v. Crevier, 33 Minn. 372 , *352 ( .)

Jensen v. Crevier, 33 Minn. 372 , ( 23 N. W. Rep.

In Jensen v. Crevier, 33 Minn. 372 , ( 23 N. W. Rep.

Assuming that .this was a decision, and not mere obiter, it is, as applied to the case then before the court, (an application to set aside an alleged default, and for leave to answer,) virtually overruled in Jensen v. Crevier, 33 Minn. 372 , ( 23 N. W. Rep.

Jensen v. Crevier, 33 Minn. 372 , ( 23 N. W. Rep.

Jensen v. Crevier, 33 Minn. 372 , ( 23 N. W. Rep.