Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite County of Ramsey v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co., 24 N.W. 313.

41 citing documents.

United States Steel Corp. v. State 324 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1982
State v. P. K. M. Electric Co-operative, Inc. 65 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1954
State v. P. K. M. Electric Co-operative, Inc. 65 N.W.2d 871 Minn. 1954
Co. 33 Minn. 537 , , and City of St.
The Pullman Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation 25 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1947
The Pullman Co. v. Commissioner of Taxation 25 N.W.2d 838 Minn. 1947
Co. 33 Minn. 537 , 24 N.W.
State v. Ritschel 20 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1945
State v. Ritschel 20 N.W.2d 673 Minn. 1945
Co. 33 Minn. 537 , , which involved the exemption of railroad property from general taxation because of the fact that the railroad paid a gross earnings tax in lieu of all others, we recognized this principle of construction, and the case is cited as being authority for that proposition.
State v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. 292 N.W. 401 Minn. 1939
State v. Duluth, Missabe & Northern Railway Co. 292 N.W. 401 Minn. 1939
Co. 33 Minn. 537 , ; State v. N. W. Tel.
Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Holm 230 N.W. 815 Minn. 1930
Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Holm 230 N.W. 815 Minn. 1930
Co. 33 Minn. 537 , 24 N.W.
State v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 168 N.W. 180 Minn. 1918
State v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. 168 N.W. 180 Minn. 1918
Co. 33 Minn. 537 , ; County of Todd v. St.
State v. United States Express Co. 131 N.W. 489 Minn. 1911
State v. United States Express Co. 131 N.W. 489 Minn. 1911
Co., 33 Minn. 537 , ; County of Todd v. St.
State v. Minneapolis & St. Paul Suburban Railway Co. 130 N.W. 71 Minn. 1911
State v. Minneapolis & St. Paul Suburban Railway Co. 130 N.W. 71 Minn. 1911
Co., 33 Minn. 537 , ; State v. Minnesota & International Ry.
State v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co. 120 N.W. 534 Minn. 1909
State v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co. 120 N.W. 534 Minn. 1909
Co., 33 Minn. 537 , ; County of Todd v. St.
State v. Twin City Telephone Co. 116 N.W. 835 Minn. 1908
State v. Twin City Telephone Co. 116 N.W. 835 Minn. 1908
Co., 33 Minn. 537 , : “This theory, however, necessarily rests upon the assumption that the property of the corporation will be held and used by it for those purposes for which the corporation exists, and that b'y such use an income will be derived, the percentage of which is received by the state in'place of a tax upon th
County of Traverse v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. 76 N.W. 217 Minn. 1898
County of Traverse v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. 76 N.W. 217 Minn. 1898
Co., 33 Minn. 537 , ; County of Stevens v. St.
State ex rel. Minnesota Transfer Railway Co. v. District Court 71 N.W. 27 Minn. 1897
State ex rel. Minnesota Transfer Railway Co. v. District Court 71 N.W. 27 Minn. 1897
In County v. Chicago, 33 Minn. 537 , , it was said that it must be supposed that it was contemplated that the commuted' system of taxation would, upon the whole, fairly effect the objects of taxation with respect to such corporations, and be equivalent in its results to the ordinary system, but that this theory necessarily rested upon the
State ex rel. Marr v. Luther 57 N.W. 464 Minn. 1894
State ex rel. Marr v. Luther 57 N.W. 464 Minn. 1894
Co., 33 Minn. 537, ( ;) County of Todd v. St.
Ramsey County v. Macalester College 53 N.W. 704 Minn. 1892
Ramsey County v. Macalester College 53 N.W. 704 Minn. 1892
Co., 33 Minn. 537, ( 24 N. W. Rep.
County of St. Louis v. St. Paul & Duluth Railroad 48 N.W. 334 Minn. 1891
County of Morrison v. St. Paul & Northern Pacific Railway Co. 44 N.W. 982 Minn. 1890
County of Morrison v. St. Paul & Northern Pacific Railway Co. 44 N.W. 982 Minn. 1890
Co., 33 Minn. 537 , ( 24 N. W. Rep.
County of Redwood v. Winona & St. Peter Land Co. 41 N.W. 465 Minn. 1889
County of Redwood v. Winona & St. Peter Land Co. 41 N.W. 465 Minn. 1889
Co., 33 Minn. 537 , ( 24 N. W. Rep.
City of St. Paul v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. 39 Minn. 112 Minn. 1888
City of St. Paul v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. 39 Minn. 112 Minn. 1888
Co., 33 Minn. 537 , ( 24 N. W. Rep.
State v. Northern Pacific Railroad 38 N.W. 635 Minn. 1888
State v. Northern Pacific Railroad 38 N.W. 635 Minn. 1888
Co., 33 Minn. 537 , ( 24 N. W. Rep.
County of Todd v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. 36 N.W. 109 Minn. 1888
County of Todd v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. 36 N.W. 109 Minn. 1888
Co., 33 Minn. 537 , ( 24 N. W. Rep.
Chauncey v. Wass 25 N.W. 457 Minn. 1885