Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Newell v. Minneapolis, Lyndale & Minnetonka Railway Co., 27 N.W. 839.

24 citing documents.

Willoughby v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 38 N.W.2d 186 Minn. 1949
Willoughby v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co. 38 N.W.2d 186 Minn. 1949
Co. 35 Minn. 112 , , 59 Am.
City of St. Paul v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 245 N.W. 33 Minn. 1932
City of St. Paul v. Twin City Motor Bus Co. 245 N.W. 33 Minn. 1932
Co. 35 Minn. 112 , , 59 Am.
Town of Kinghurst v. International Lumber Co. 174 Minn. 305 Minn. 1928
Town of Kinghurst v. International Lumber Co. 219 N.W. 172 Minn. 1928
Town of Kinghurst v. International Lumber Co. 174 Minn. 305 Minn. 1928
Co. 35 Minn. 112 , , 59 Am.
Town of Kinghurst v. International Lumber Co. 219 N.W. 172 Minn. 1928
Co. 35 Minn. 112 , 27 N.W.
City of Marshall v. Kalman 190 N.W. 597 Minn. 1922
City of Marshall v. Kalman 190 N.W. 597 Minn. 1922
Co. 35 Minn. 112 , , 59 Am.
State v. Minneapolis & St. Paul Suburban Railway Co. 166 N.W. 770 Minn. 1918
State v. Minneapolis & St. Paul Suburban Railway Co. 166 N.W. 770 Minn. 1918
Co. 35 Minn. 112 , , 59 Am.
City of St. Paul v. Great Northern Railway Co. 163 N.W. 788 Minn. 1917
City of St. Paul v. Great Northern Railway Co. 163 N.W. 788 Minn. 1917
Co. 35 Minn. 112 , , 59 Am.
State v. Minneapolis & St. Paul Suburban Railway Co. 130 N.W. 71 Minn. 1911
State v. Minneapolis & St. Paul Suburban Railway Co. 130 N.W. 71 Minn. 1911
Co., 35 Minn. 112 , , 59 Am.
Minneapolis & St. Paul Suburban Railway Co. v. Manitou Forest Syndicate 112 N.W. 13 Minn. 1907
Minneapolis & St. Paul Suburban Railway Co. v. Manitou Forest Syndicate 112 N.W. 13 Minn. 1907
Co., 35 Minn. 112 , , 59 Am.
L. Realty Co. v. Johnson 100 N.W. 94 Minn. 1904
L. Realty Co. v. Johnson 100 N.W. 94 Minn. 1904
Co., 35 Minn. 112 , ; and Ellsworth v. Lord, 40 Minn. 337 , , in which it was said that the dedication of a highway by the landowner confers a mere easement for public use as a highway, and the owner retains the right to use the land for any lawful purpose compatible with the full enjoyment of the public easem
Powers Mercantile Co. v. Blethen 97 N.W. 1056 Minn. 1904
Romer v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 77 N.W. 825 Minn. 1899
Romer v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 77 N.W. 825 Minn. 1899
Gustafson v. Hamm 57 N.W. 1054 Minn. 1894