DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite May v. Walker, 28 N.W. 252.

28 citing documents.

  • Lucas v. Medical Arts Building Co. 291 N.W. 892 Minn. 1940
  • Lucas v. Medical Arts Building Co. 291 N.W. 892 Minn. 1940
    Louis, 187 Minn. 68 , , and cases there cited), “an assignment of wages to be earned in the future under an existing contract of employment is good between the parties.” In May v. Walker, 35 Minn. 194, 197 , , plaintiff, a creditor of defendant, brought garnishment against the assignee under a voluntary assignment for the benefit of creditors made by defendant.
  • Murphy v. Casey 195 N.W. 627 Minn. 1923
  • Murphy v. Casey 195 N.W. 627 Minn. 1923
    May v. Walker, 35 Minn. 194 , ; Stephon v. Topic, 147 Minn. 263 , .
  • Moore v. Bettingen 133 N.W. 561 Minn. 1911
  • Moore v. Bettingen 133 N.W. 561 Minn. 1911
    It was held in May v. Walker, 35 Minn. 194 , , that such an assignment was void as to nonassenting creditors, and that decision was followed and applied in McConnell v. Rakness, 41 Minn. 3 , .
  • Horton v. Seymour 85 N.W. 551 Minn. 1901
  • Horton v. Seymour 85 N.W. 551 Minn. 1901
    The assignment by Walker, Judd & Yeazie to Mr. Jenks having been held void (as against nonassenting creditors) by this court in May v. Walker, 35 Minn. 194 , , the appellant was appointed, in new insolvency proceedings, receiver of Walker, Judd & Veazie (see In matter of Walker, 37 Minn. 243 , , ), and in 1893 brought a suit in the district court for Bamsey county against Mr. Jenks and all creditors of Walker, Judd & Veazie
  • Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co. v. Brooks 68 N.W. 5 Minn. 1896
  • Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co. v. Brooks 68 N.W. 5 Minn. 1896
    May v. Walker, 35 Minn. 194 , ; In re Allen, 41 Minn. 430 , ; Thompson v. Winona Harvester Works, 41 Minn. 434 , .
  • Hawkins v. Ireland 67 N.W. 73 Minn. 1896
  • Hawkins v. Ireland 67 N.W. 73 Minn. 1896
    This proposition has been assumed to be correct in several cases in this court: May v. Walker, 35 Minn. 194 , ; Covey v. Cutler, 55 Minn. 18 , .
  • Tarbox v. Stevenson 58 N.W. 157 Minn. 1894
  • Tarbox v. Stevenson 58 N.W. 157 Minn. 1894
    May v. Walker, 35 Minn. 194 , ( .)
  • Olson v. O'Brien 48 N.W. 453 Minn. 1891
  • Olson v. O'Brien 48 N.W. 453 Minn. 1891
    May v. Walker, 35 Minn. 194 , ( 28 N. W. Rep.
  • Hanson v. Metcalf 48 N.W. 441 Minn. 1891
  • Hanson v. Metcalf 48 N.W. 441 Minn. 1891
    The plaintiff also insists that under the rule in May v. Walker, 35 Minn. 194 , ( 28 N. W. Rep.
  • Thompson v. Winona Harvester Works 43 N.W. 383 Minn. 1889
  • In re Allen 43 N.W. 382 Minn. 1889
  • In re Allen 43 N.W. 382 Minn. 1889
    trust, and the payment and discharge in full of all *433 the said lawful debts owing by the parties of the first part, there shall be any surplus of the said proceeds remaining in the hands of the party of the second part, (assignee,) then to repay such surplus to the parties of the first part, (Allen and Levinson,) their executors,” etc. We think the case falls within the rule in May v. Walker, 35 Minn. 194 , ( 28 N. W. Rep.
  • Thompson v. Winona Harvester Works 43 N.W. 383 Minn. 1889
    May v. Walker, 35 Minn. 194 , ( 28 N. W. Rep.
  • McConnell v. Rakness 42 N.W. 539 Minn. 1889
  • McConnell v. Rakness 42 N.W. 539 Minn. 1889
    May v. Walker, 35 Minn. 194 , ( 28 N. W. Rep.
  • Security Bank v. Beede 35 N.W. 435 Minn. 1887
  • Security Bank v. Beede 35 N.W. 435 Minn. 1887
    The assignment differs from that in May v. Walker, 35 Minn. 194 , ( 28 N. W. Rep.
  • In re Walker 33 N.W. 852 Minn. 1887
  • In re Walker 33 N.W. 852 Minn. 1887
    May v. Walker, 35 Minn. 194 , ( 28 N. W. Rep.