Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sanborn v. City of Minneapolis, 29 N.W. 126.

27 citing documents.

Joan M. Nichols v. State of Minnesota, Office of the Secretary of State Minn. 2015
Nichols v. State 858 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 2015
Nichols v. State 858 N.W.2d 773 Minn. 2015
691, 693 (1931) (“Without its effective consent, ‘the state cannot be subjected to the jurisdiction of the courts, nor be compelled to defend in them.’ ” (quoting Sanborn v. City of Minneapolis, 35 Minn. 314, 318 , 29 N.W.
Joan M. Nichols v. State of Minnesota, Office of the Secretary of State Minn. 2015
691, 693 (1931) (“Without its effective consent, ‘the state cannot be subjected to the jurisdiction of the courts, nor be compelled to defend in them.’ ” (quoting Sanborn v. City of Minneapolis, 35 Minn. 314, 318, 29 N.W.
Nusbaum v. County of Blue Earth 422 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 1988
Nusbaum v. County of Blue Earth 422 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 1988
732, 732 (1904); Sanborn v. City of Minneapolis, 35 Minn. 314 , 29 N.W.
Nieting v. Blondell 235 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 1975
Nieting v. Blondell 235 N.W.2d 597 Minn. 1975
And, in 1886, in Sanborn v. City of Minneapolis, 35 Minn. 314 , we stated that “[t]he state cannot be subjected to the jurisdiction of the courts, nor be compelled to defend in them.” 35 Minn. 318 , .
Minneapolis Athletic Club v. Cohler 177 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1970
Minneapolis Athletic Club v. Cohler 177 N.W.2d 786 Minn. 1970
This court had occasion in Sanborn v. City of Minneapolis, 35 Minn. 314 , , to construe an instrument to determine whether it conveyed a grant in fee or an easement.
Chun King Sales, Inc. v. County of St. Louis 98 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1959
Chun King Sales, Inc. v. County of St. Louis 98 N.W.2d 194 Minn. 1959
Sanborn v. City of Minneapolis, 35 Minn. 314 , , and Foster v. City of Duluth, 120 Minn. 484 , , 48 L.R.A.
State v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. 75 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 1956
State v. Minnesota Power & Light Co. 75 N.W.2d 386 Minn. 1956
The state counters with the proposition that the power company is not an occupant of the land over which the right-of-way was acquired, citing Sanborn v. City of Minneapolis, 35 Minn. 314 , .
In Re Delinquent Real Estate Taxes, Polk County 234 N.W. 691 Minn. 1931
In Re Delinquent Real Estate Taxes, Polk County 234 N.W. 691 Minn. 1931
We reiterate the conclusion (reached in Sanborn v. City of Minneapolis, 35 Minn. 314, 318 , , and followed in Foster v. City of Duluth, 120 Minn. 484 , ) that until there is effective law to the contrary “the rights or interests of the state in land are not subject to the provisions of the laws for the assessment and collection of taxes.” The courts cannot in tax proceedings
In Re Appeal of Sowers 220 N.W. 419 Minn. 1928
In Re Appeal of Sowers 220 N.W. 419 Minn. 1928
Sanborn v. City of Minneapolis, 35 Minn. 314 , .
Foster v. City of Duluth 140 N.W. 129 Minn. 1913
Foster v. City of Duluth 140 N.W. 129 Minn. 1913
This is very clearly decided in Sanborn v. City of Minneapolis, 35 Minn. 314 , .
Carlson v. Minnesota Land & Colonization Co. 129 N.W. 768 Minn. 1911
Carlson v. Minnesota Land & Colonization Co. 129 N.W. 768 Minn. 1911
Farrell v. Howard, 52 Minn. 76 , ; Sanborn v. City of Minneapolis, 35 Minn. 314 , ; Knight v. Indiana, 47 Ind.
McCue v. Barrett 109 N.W. 594 Minn. 1906
McCue v. Barrett 109 N.W. 594 Minn. 1906
In the case cited the court distinguished the cases of Sanborn v. City of Minneapolis, 35 Minn. 314 , , and Flaten v. City of Moorhead, 51 Minn. 518 , , 19 L. R. A. 195, relied upon by the plaintiff.
Soukup v. Topka 55 N.W. 824 Minn. 1893
Soukup v. Topka 55 N.W. 824 Minn. 1893
In Sanborn v. City of Minneapolis, 35 Minn. 314 , ( 29 N. W. Rep.
Winston v. Johnson 45 N.W. 958 Minn. 1890