Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Geib v. Reynolds, 28 N.W. 923.

47 citing documents.

Citizens State Bank v. Raven Trading Partners, Inc. 786 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 2010
Citizens State Bank v. Raven Trading Partners, Inc. 786 N.W.2d 274 Minn. 2010
35 Minn. 331, 335-37 , 28 N.W.
Holden v. Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co. 27 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1947
Holden v. Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co. 27 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 1947
2 Geib v. Reynolds, 35 Minn. 331 , ; Wiley v. Dean, 67 Minn. 62 , ; State Bank v. Mutual Tel.
Wetsel v. Guaranteed Mortgage Co. 263 N.W. 605 Minn. 1935
Wetsel v. Guaranteed Mortgage Co. 263 N.W. 605 Minn. 1935
Geib v. Reynolds, 35 Minn. 331 , ; Hirleman v. Nickels, 193 Minn. 51 , ; Hansen v. Wilmers, 162 Minn. 139 , .
Buerger Brothers Supply Co. v. El Rey Furniture Co. 40 P.2d 81 Ariz. 1935
Hirleman v. Nickels 258 N.W. 13 Minn. 1934
Hirleman v. Nickels 258 N.W. 13 Minn. 1934
It has long been settled law in this state that “a promissory note given for an antecedent debt does not discharge the debt, unless expressly given and received as absolute payment; and the burden of proof is upon the party asserting the fact to show that it was so given and re *56 ceived, the presumption being to the contrary.” Geib v. Reynolds, 85 Minn. 331, 335 , .
Carity Motors, Inc. v. Eichten 249 N.W. 190 Minn. 1933
Carity Motors, Inc. v. Eichten 249 N.W. 190 Minn. 1933
Geib v. Reynolds, 35 Minn. 331, 336 , Munson v. Bensel, 169 Minn. 434 , .
Barsness v. Tiegen 238 N.W. 161 Minn. 1931
Barsness v. Tiegen 238 N.W. 161 Minn. 1931
Geib v. Reynolds, 35 Minn. 331 , ; State Bank v. Mutual Tel.
Hagen v. First State Bank 230 N.W. 267 Minn. 1930
Hagen v. First State Bank 230 N.W. 267 Minn. 1930
Geib v. Reynolds, 35 Minn. 331 , , is an early case.
Munson v. Bensel 211 N.W. 838 Minn. 1927
Munson v. Bensel 211 N.W. 838 Minn. 1927
1915A, 1082; Geib v. Reynolds, 35 Minn. 331 , ; Wiley v. Dean, 67 Minn. 62 , ; Anderson v. Willson, 132 Minn. 364 , .
Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. Nummedahl 207 N.W. 313 Minn. 1926
Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. Nummedahl 207 N.W. 313 Minn. 1926
Geib v. Reynolds, 35 Minn. 331 , .
Miller v. Farmers State Bank of Arco 206 N.W. 930 Minn. 1925
Miller v. Farmers State Bank of Arco 206 N.W. 930 Minn. 1925
Geib v. Reynolds, 35 Minn. 331 , ; State Bank v. Mut.
Mikolas v. Val Blatz Brewing Co. 180 N.W. 109 Minn. 1920
Mikolas v. Val Blatz Brewing Co. 180 N.W. 109 Minn. 1920
The giving of new notes for an antecedent debt does not discharge tbe debt unless expressly given and received as absolute payment, Geib v. Reynolds, 35 Minn. 331 , , and this is the rule even though a third party joins in the notes.
Way v. Mooers 160 N.W. 1014 Minn. 1917
Way v. Mooers 160 N.W. 1014 Minn. 1917
“A promissory note given for an antecedent debt does not discharge the debt, unless expressly given and received as absolute payment; and the burden of proof is upon the party asserting the fact to show that it was so given and received, the presumption being to the contrary.” Geib v. Reynolds, 35 Minn. 331 , .
State Bank v. Mutual Telephone Co. 143 N.W. 912 Minn. 1913
State Bank v. Mutual Telephone Co. 143 N.W. 912 Minn. 1913
Geib v. Reynolds, 35 Minn. 331 , ; Hanson v. Tarbox, 47 Minn. 433 , ; Wiley v. Dean, 67 Minn. 62 , ; Washington Slate Co. v. Burdick, 60 Minn. 270 , ; Combination Steel & Iron Co. v. St.
Tillinghast v. United States Saving & Loan Co. 108 N.W. 472 Minn. 1906
Tillinghast v. United States Saving & Loan Co. 108 N.W. 472 Minn. 1906
Geib v. Reynolds, 35 Minn. 331 , ; Combination S. & I. Co. v. St.
Hunt v. Roosen 91 N.W. 259 Minn. 1902
Hunt v. Roosen 91 N.W. 259 Minn. 1902
Geib v. Reynolds, 35 Minn. 331 , .
Woodland Co. v. Mendenhall 85 N.W. 164 Minn. 1901
Woodland Co. v. Mendenhall 85 N.W. 164 Minn. 1901
Washington S. Co. v. Burdick, 60 Minn. 270 , ; Geib v. Reynolds, 35 Minn. 331 , .
Seymour v. Bank of Minnesota 81 N.W. 1059 Minn. 1900
Seymour v. Bank of Minnesota 81 N.W. 1059 Minn. 1900
Geib v. Reynolds, 35 Minn. 331, 335 , .
Washington Slate Co. v. Burdick 62 N.W. 285 Minn. 1895
Washington Slate Co. v. Burdick 62 N.W. 285 Minn. 1895
Geib v. Reynolds, 35 Minn. 331 , .
Layman v. Minneapolis Realty Co. 62 N.W. 113 Minn. 1895
Layman v. Minneapolis Realty Co. 62 N.W. 113 Minn. 1895
Geib v. Reynolds, 35 Minn. 331 , .
Emmert v. Thompson 52 N.W. 31 Minn. 1892
Emmert v. Thompson 52 N.W. 31 Minn. 1892
Geib v. Reynolds, 35 Minn. 331 , ( 28 N. W. Rep.
Combination Steel & Iron Co. v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 49 N.W. 744 Minn. 1891
Combination Steel & Iron Co. v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 49 N.W. 744 Minn. 1891
Geib v. Reynolds, 35 Minn. 331 , ( 28 N. W. Rep.
Gerdine v. Menage 43 N.W. 91 Minn. 1889
Gerdine v. Menage 43 N.W. 91 Minn. 1889
Cobb v. Dyer, 69 Me. 494 ; *421 Geib v. Reynolds, 35 Minn. 331 , ( 28 N. W. Rep.
Ligget v. Himle 38 N.W. 201 Minn. 1888
Ligget v. Himle 38 N.W. 201 Minn. 1888
The thoroughly-settled principles stated in the paragraphs numbered 2, 3, and 6 of the opinion of this court in Geib v. Reynolds, 35 Minn. 331 , ( 28 N. W. Rep.