Cited by

But, as held in Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. v. Minneapolis Engine and M. Works, 35 Minn. 543 , [1886], placing the machinery in position in the building with the intention of making it a permanent part of the plant is not sufficient to make such machinery a part of the realty, unless it is actually or constructively attached to the building or land.

that under Minnesota statutes, once the claims of creditors have been filed and allowed, it makes not the slightest difference to their rights and status that the action was initiated by stockholders rather than creditors, and in the latter .case “the sequestration is in the nature of an attachment or execution on behalf of the creditors.” Farmers L. & T. Co. v. Minneapolis E. & M. Works, 35 Minn. 543, 546 , ; Minnesota T. Mfg.

Farmers L. & T. Co. v. Minneapolis E. & M. Works, 35 Minn. 543 , ; Greenfield v. Hill City L. L. & L. Co. 141 Minn. 393 , .

Farmers’ L. & T. Co. v. Minneapolis E. & M. Works, 35 Minn. 543 , ; Minnesota Thresher Mnfg.

Co. 64 Minn. 386 , ; Allen *289 v. Walsh, 25 Minn. 543 ; Farmers L. & T. Co. v. Minneapolis E. & M. Works, 35 Minn. 543 , ; Spooner v. Bay St.

In Farmers L. & T. Co. v. Minneapolis E. & M. Works, 35 Minn. 543 , , a receiver was appointed in proceedings to sequestrate the property *396 of an insolvent corporation.

Farmers’ L. & T. Co. v. Minneapolis E. & M. Works, 35 Minn. 543 , ; Shay v. Security Bank of Duluth, 67 Minn. 287 , .

1 ; Farmers’ L. & T. Co. v. Minneapolis E. & M. Works, 35 Minn. 543 , ; 2 Notes on Minn. Reports, 665, and authorities there cited; Northwestern Lumber & Wrecking Co. v. Parker, 125 Minn. 107 , , 13 Am.

1 ; Farmers’ L. & T. Co. v. Minneapolis E. & M. Works, 35 Minn. 543 , .

See also as pertinent to the subject, Farmers’ L. & T. Co. v. Minneapolis E. & M. Works, 35 Minn. 543 , ; Pioneer S. & L. Co. v. Fuller, 57 Minn. 60 , ; U. S. v. New Orleans R., 12 Wall.

Farmers’ L. & T. Co. v. Minneapolis E. & M. Works, 35 Minn. 543 , ; Minnesota T. Mnfg.

Farmers v. Minneapolis, 35 Minn. 543 , ; Merrill v. Ressler, 37 Minn. 82 , ; Chamberlain v. O’Brien, 46 Minn. 80 , ; Thomas v. Foote, 46 Minn. 240 , ; Gallagher v. Rosenfield, 47 Minn. 507 , ; Shay v. Security, 67 Minn. 287 , 69 N W. 920; Thomas v. Drew, supra, page 69, .

Farmers’ L. & T. Co. v. Minneapolis E. & M. W., 35 Minn. 543 , ; Merrill v. Ressler, 37 Minn. 82 , ; Thomas Mnfg.

In-the last case cited, the court simply holds (following Farmers’ Loan & T. Co. v. Minneapolis Engine & M. Works, 35 Minn. 543 , ) that a receiver appointed under the provisions of G. S. 1894, c. 76, has the same powers and functions .as a receiver upon a creditors’ bill, or upon proceedings supplementary to execution.

But, as held in Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. v. Minneapolis Engine & M. Works, 35 Minn. 543 , , placing the machinery in position in the building with the intention of making it a permanent part of the plant is not sufficient to make such machinery a part of the realty, unless it is actu.ally or constructively attached to the building or land.

The receiver, in the case of Farmers’ L. & T. Co. v. Minneapolis E. & M. Works, 35 Minn. 543 , 29 H. W. 349, was held to represent creditors, so as to avoid an unfiled chattel mortgage, by virtue of the provisions of the statute, which provided for the sequestration of all of the property of an insolvent corporation.

639 ;) Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. v. Minneapolis E. & M. Works, 35 Minn. 543 , ( 29 N. W. Rep.

er the statute as a chattel mortgage; that therefore the attempted filing of it was entirely nugatory; that, not being accompanied by an immediate delivery, or followed by an actual and continued change of possession, of the property, it was void as against creditors, and, consequently, also void as against defendant under the doctrine of Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. v. Minneapolis Engine Works, 35 Minn. 543, ( 29 N. W. Rep.

Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Minneapolis Engine Works, 35 Minn. 543 ( 29 N. W. Rep.

It was so considered in Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Minn. Engine & Machine Works, 35 Minn. 543 , ( 29 N. W. Rep.

The decision of this court in Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Minneapolis Engine & Machine Works, 35 Minn. 543 , ( 29 N. W. Rep.