DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Conlan v. Grace, 30 N.W. 880.

44 citing documents.

  • Untiedt v. Grand Laboratories, Inc. 552 N.W.2d 571 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
  • Untiedt v. Grand Laboratories, Inc. 552 N.W.2d 571 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
    a (1979) (collectively authorizing the adoption of a previously-affixed symbol as an authenticating signature); 2 Arthur L. Corbin, Corbin on Contracts § 522, at 768-70 (1950) (same, and recognizing a party’s conduct and surrounding circumstances as evidence of intent); see also Conlan v. Grace, 36 Minn. 276, 281 , 30 N.W.
  • Greer v. Kooiker 253 N.W.2d 133 Minn. 1977
  • Greer v. Kooiker 253 N.W.2d 133 Minn. 1977
    4 In Conlan v. Grace, 36 Minn. 276, 281 , this court defined the test of adequate “subscription” as whether the offeror intended to authenticate the document: “* * * If signed by the grantee’s authority, or adopted by him as his signature, although written toy another, it is a sufficient signing by the grantor.” Accord, Radke
  • Radke v. Brenon 134 N.W.2d 887 Minn. 1965
  • Radke v. Brenon 134 N.W.2d 887 Minn. 1965
    5 Conlan v. Grace, 36 Minn. 276 , ; Restatement, Contracts, § 210.
  • Wenell v. Shapiro 260 N.W. 503 Minn. 1935
  • Wenell v. Shapiro 260 N.W. 503 Minn. 1935
    The defense cites 10 R. C. L. p. 977, § 160; Opsahl v. Judd, 30 Minn. 126 , ; Conlan v. Grace, 36 Minn. 276, 279 , ; Reem v. St.
  • Kessler v. Von Bank 174 N.W. 839 Minn. 1919
  • Kessler v. Von Bank 174 N.W. 839 Minn. 1919
    Conlan v. Grace, 36 Minn. 276 , ; Nazro v. Ware, 38 Minn. 443 , ; Lee v. Fletcher, 46 Minn. 49 , , 12 L.R.A.
  • Muenkel v. Muenkel 173 N.W. 184 Minn. 1919
  • Muenkel v. Muenkel 173 N.W. 184 Minn. 1919
    Conlan v. Grace, 36 Minn. 276 , ; Nichols & Shepard Co. v. Wiedemann, 72 Minn. 344 , , .
  • Ingersoll v. Odendahl 162 N.W. 525 Minn. 1917
  • Ingersoll v. Odendahl 162 N.W. 525 Minn. 1917
    Conlan v. Grace, 36 Minn. 276 , ; Lee v. Fletcher, 46 Minn. 49 , , 12 L.R.A.
  • Luck Land Co. v. Dixon 155 N.W. 1038 Minn. 1916
  • Luck Land Co. v. Dixon 155 N.W. 1038 Minn. 1916
    Conlan v. Grace, 36 Minn. 276 , , subdivisions 3 and 4; Fitchette v. Yictoria Land Co. 93 Minn. 485 , .
  • Lindquist v. Gibbs 142 N.W. 156 Minn. 1913
  • Lindquist v. Gibbs 142 N.W. 156 Minn. 1913
    Butler v. Bohn, 31 Minn. 325 , ; Wagner v. Nagel, 33 Minn. 348 , ; Conlan v. Grace, 36 Minn. 276 , ; Coggins v. Higbie, 83 Minn. 83 , ; Fitchette v. Victoria Land Co. 93 Minn. 485 , ; Naeseth v. Hommedal, 109 Minn. 153 , ; Moriarty v. Maloney, 121 Minn. 285 , .
  • National Citizens Bank v. Thro 124 N.W. 965 Minn. 1910
  • National Citizens Bank v. Thro 124 N.W. 965 Minn. 1910
    Conlan v. Grace, 36 Minn. 276 , ; Nichols & Shepard Co. v. Wiedemann, 72 Minn. 344 , , ; Knatvold v. Wilkinson, 83 Minn. 265 , ; Veum v. Sheeran, 88 Minn. 257 , .
  • Fitchette v. Victoria Land Co. 101 N.W. 655 Minn. 1904
  • Fitchette v. Victoria Land Co. 101 N.W. 655 Minn. 1904
    Butler v. Bohn, 31 Minn. 325 , ; Conlan v. Grace, 36 Minn. 276 , ; and Coggins v. Higbie, 83 Minn. 83 , .
  • Chastek v. Souba 101 N.W. 618 Minn. 1904
  • Chastek v. Souba 101 N.W. 618 Minn. 1904
    The following authorities record a number of transactions in which title to lands passed in the absence of actual, although legal, delivery of deeds: Stevens v. Hatch, 6 Minn. 19 (64); Conlan v. Grace, 36 Minn. 276 , ; Nazro v. Ware, 38 Minn. 443 , ; Lee v. Fletcher, 46 Minn. 49 , ; Haeg v. Haeg, 53 Minn. 33 , ; Barnard v. Thurston, 86 Minn. 343 , .
  • Hooper v. Vanstrum 100 N.W. 229 Minn. 1904
  • Hooper v. Vanstrum 100 N.W. 229 Minn. 1904
    (172); Thompson v. Easton, 31 Minn. 99 , ; Conlan v. Grace, 36 Minn. 276 , ; Nazro v. Ware, 38 Minn. 443 , ; Lee v. Fletcher, 46 Minn. 49 , ; Barnard v. Thurston, 86 Minn. 343 , .
  • State v. Gallehugh 94 N.W. 723 Minn. 1903
  • State v. Gallehugh 94 N.W. 723 Minn. 1903
    §§ 348-366; Conlan v. Grace, 36 Minn. 276 , .
  • Barnard v. Thurston 90 N.W. 574 Minn. 1902
  • Barnard v. Thurston 90 N.W. 574 Minn. 1902
    Stevens v. Hatch, 6 Minn. 19 (64); Comer v. Baldwin, 16 Minn. 151 (172); Thompson v. Easton, 31 Minn. 99 , ; Conlan v. Grace, 36 Minn. 276, 281 , ; Nazro v. Ware, 38 Minn. 443 , ; Lee v. Fletcher, 46 Minn. 49, 52 , .
  • Knatvold v. Wilkinson 86 N.W. 99 Minn. 1901
  • Knatvold v. Wilkinson 86 N.W. 99 Minn. 1901
    Norris v. Clark, 33 Minn. 476 , ; Lucy v. Wilkins, 33 Minn. 441 , ; Conlan v. Grace, 36 Minn. 276 , ; Austin v. Robertson, 25 Minn. 431 .
  • Reem v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 80 N.W. 638 Minn. 1899
  • Reem v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 80 N.W. 638 Minn. 1899
    Conlan v. Grace, 36 Minn. 276, 280 , .
  • Roberts v. Nelson 68 N.W. 14 Minn. 1896
  • Roberts v. Nelson 68 N.W. 14 Minn. 1896
    258 (323), and Thompson v. Morgan, 6 Minn. 199 (292), and while it did not at once squarely overrule these cases (see Ross v. Worthington, 11 Minn. 323 [438]), yet for many years the doctrine *242 of this court has been as above stated (Tidd v. Rines, 26 Minn. 201 , ; Morton v. Leland, 27 Minn. 35 , ; Johnson v. Sandhoff, 30 Minn. 197 , ; Conlan v. Grace, 36 Minn. 276 , ; Dobbin v. Cordiner, 41 Minn. 165 , ; Lydiard v. Chute, 45 Minn. 277 , ).
  • Wolford v. Farnham 49 N.W. 528 Minn. 1891
  • Wolford v. Farnham 49 N.W. 528 Minn. 1891
    Conlan v. Grace, 36 Minn. 276 , ( 30 N. W. Rep.
  • Lee v. Fletcher 48 N.W. 456 Minn. 1891
  • Lee v. Fletcher 48 N.W. 456 Minn. 1891
    614 ;) Conlan v. Grace, 36 Minn. 276 , ( 30 N. W. Rep.
  • Dobbin v. Cordiner 42 N.W. 870 Minn. 1889
  • Dobbin v. Cordiner 42 N.W. 870 Minn. 1889
    889 ;) Conlan v. Grace, 36 Minn. 276 , ( 30 N. W. Rep.
  • Nazro v. Ware 38 N.W. 359 Minn. 1888
  • Nazro v. Ware 38 N.W. 359 Minn. 1888
    614 ;) Conlan v. Grace, 36 Minn. 276, 281 , (30 N. W. Rep, 880.)