Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Pye v. City of Mankato, 31 N.W. 863.

34 citing documents.

Chabot v. City of Sauk Rapids 412 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Chabot v. City of Sauk Rapids 412 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
250, 251 (1898) (city liable for storm sewer *375 reservoir which is hazardous to persons below when city has constructive notice of potential problem with system); Pye v. City of Mankato, 36 Minn. 373, 375 , 31 N.W.
Electric Short Line Terminal Co. v. City of Minneapolis 64 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 1954
Electric Short Line Terminal Co. v. City of Minneapolis 64 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 1954
Paul, 25 Minn. 331 ; Henderson v. City *5 of Minneapolis, 32 Minn. 319 , ; Pye v. City of Mankato, 36 Minn. 373 , .
Collins v. Village of Richfield 55 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1952
Collins v. Village of Richfield 55 N.W.2d 628 Minn. 1952
Paul, 25 Minn. 331 ; Henderson v. City of Minneapolis, 32 Minn. 319 , ; Pye v. City of Mankato, 36 Minn. 373 , .
Roche v. City of Minneapolis 27 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1947
Roche v. City of Minneapolis 27 N.W.2d 295 Minn. 1947
Pye v. City of Mankato, 36 Minn. 373 , , 1 A. S. R. 671; McClure v. City of Red Wing, 28 Minn. 186 , ; Taubert v. City of St.
Bang v. Independent School District No. 27 225 N.W. 449 Minn. 1929
Bang v. Independent School District No. 27 225 N.W. 449 Minn. 1929
Bang v. Independent School District No. 27 225 N.W. 449 Minn. 1929
village and school district putting sand in a natural ravine'so that it washed upon the premises of the plaintiff); Joyce v. Village of Janesville, 132 Minn. 121 , , L. R. A. 1916D, 426 (discharging sewage of village upon plaintiff’s land); Batcher v. City of Staples, 120 Minn. 86 , (discharge of sewer of city into creek near plaintiff’s land); Pye v. City of Mankato, 36 Minn. 373 , , 1 A. S. R. 671 (diverting water from natural course and casting upon lands of another); Kiefer v. County of Rams
Bang v. Independent School District No. 27 225 N.W. 449 Minn. 1929
140 (discharge of sewer of city into creek near plaintiff's land); Pye v. City of Mankato, 36 Minn. 373 , 31 N.W.
Newman v. County of St. Louis 176 N.W. 191 Minn. 1920
Newman v. County of St. Louis 176 N.W. 191 Minn. 1920
Pye v. City of Mankato, 36 Minn. 373 , , 1 Am.
Joyce v. Village of Janesville 155 N.W. 1067 Minn. 1916
Joyce v. Village of Janesville 155 N.W. 1067 Minn. 1916
matters other than surface waters — gathered up by defendant’s ditch and drain and cast upon plaintiff’s land in injurious quantities, the same must be regarded as amounting to acts of positive trespass, coming under *126 the fifth division of principles governing the liability of municipal corporations for injuries to private property as laid down by Justice Mitchell in Pye v. City of Mankato, 36 Minn. 373 , , 1 Am.
Batcher v. City of Staples 139 N.W. 140 Minn. 1912
Batcher v. City of Staples 139 N.W. 140 Minn. 1912
501, and Pye v. City of Mankato, 36 Minn. 373 , , 1 Am.
O'Neill v. City of St. Paul 116 N.W. 1114 Minn. 1908
O'Neill v. City of St. Paul 116 N.W. 1114 Minn. 1908
This case does not belong to that class of cases considered in Pye v. City of Mankato, 36 Minn. 373 , , 1 Am.
Robbins v. Village of Willmar 73 N.W. 1097 Minn. 1898
Robbins v. Village of Willmar 73 N.W. 1097 Minn. 1898
Pye v. City, 36 Minn. 373 *407 ; Follmann v. City, 45 Minn. 457 , ; Beach v. Gaylord, 43 Minn. 476 , ; Township v. Devine, 36 Minn. 53 , .
Sheehan v. Flynn 61 N.W. 462 Minn. 1894
Sheehan v. Flynn 61 N.W. 462 Minn. 1894
e confusion has arisen by failing to take into consideration the topography of the low, flat country in the Bed Biver valley, where arose the Hogenson Case, the Olson Case,, and the Jordan Case, and the more high, hilly, or rolling country in other parts of the state, where arose the other cases above cited, and such cases as Kobs v. City of Minneapolis, 22 Minn. 159 , and Pye v. City of Mankato, 36 Minn. 373 , ( .)
Brown v. Winona & Southwestern Railway Co. 55 N.W. 123 Minn. 1893
Brown v. Winona & Southwestern Railway Co. 55 N.W. 123 Minn. 1893
In Pye v. City of Mankato, 36 Minn. 373 , ( 31 N. W. Rep.
Beach v. Gaylord 45 N.W. 1095 Minn. 1890
Beach v. Gaylord 45 N.W. 1095 Minn. 1890
342 ;) Pye v. City of Mankato, 36 Minn. 373 , ( 31 N. W. Rep.
Jordan v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. 43 N.W. 849 Minn. 1889
Jordan v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. 43 N.W. 849 Minn. 1889
342 ;) Pye v. City of Mankato, 36 Minn. 373 , ( 31 N. W. Rep.
Rowe v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. 43 N.W. 76 Minn. 1889
Rowe v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. 43 N.W. 76 Minn. 1889
Pye v. City of Mankato, 36 Minn. 373 , ( 31 N. W. Rep.
Redmond v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. 40 N.W. 64 Minn. 1888
Redmond v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. 40 N.W. 64 Minn. 1888
Counsel now argues that this was error, claiming that defendant had a right to raise its grade upon the 14 feet, as an incident to its ownership, so long as there was no improper construction, and simply an interference with the natural percolation or surface flow of water, citing, among other cases, Pye v. City of Mankato, 36 Minn. 373 , ( 31 N. W. Rep.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by