Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Barber v. Morris, 33 N.W. 559.

41 citing documents.

Schuett v. Powers 180 N.W.2d 253 Minn. 1970
Schuett v. Powers 180 N.W.2d 253 Minn. 1970
1 The relevant provisions of Rule 4.04, Rules of Civil Procedure, are as follows: “Such service shall be sufficient to confer jurisdiction: “(1) When the defendant is a resident individual having departed from the state with intent to defraud his creditors, or to avoid service, or keeps himself concealed therein with like intent * * 2 Barber v. Morris, 37 Minn. 194 , ; Feikert v. Wilson, 38 Minn. 341 , ; Brown v. St.
In Re Judicial Ditch No. 12 36 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1949
State ex rel. Great Northern Railway Co. v. District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial District 36 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1949
State ex rel. Great Northern Railway Co. v. District Court of the Sixteenth Judicial District 36 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1949
Barber v. Morris, 37 Minn. 194 , ; Wilkowske v. Lynch, 124 Minn. 492 , ; Plaster v. County of Aitkin, 135 Minn. 198 , ; Leland v. Heiberg, 156 Minn. 30 , ; Roscoe Black Co. v. Brown, 164 Minn. 440 , ; Fulton v. Okes, 195 Minn. 247 , ; Goodman v. Ancient Order of Unite
In Re Judicial Ditch No. 12 36 N.W.2d 336 Minn. 1949
Barber v. Morris, 37 Minn. 194 , 33 N.W.
Jasperson Ex Rel. Drew v. Jacobson 27 N.W.2d 788 Minn. 1947
Jasperson Ex Rel. Drew v. Jacobson 27 N.W.2d 788 Minn. 1947
In Barber v. Morris, 37 Minn. 194 , , 5 A. S. R. 836, the earlier case of Gemmell v. Rice, 13 Minn. 371 (400), was expressly overruled.
Borgen v. Corty 232 N.W. 512 Minn. 1930
Borgen v. Corty 232 N.W. 512 Minn. 1930
Barber v. Morris, 37 Minn. 194, 197 , , 5 A. S. R. 836.
In Re Peters for Vacation of Part of Third Avenue 203 N.W. 593 Minn. 1925
In Re Peters for Vacation of Part of Third Avenue 203 N.W. 593 Minn. 1925
Barber v. Morris, 37 Minn. 194 , , 5 Am.
Noonan v. Montgomery 209 P. 302 Ariz. 1922
Wagner v. Farmers Co-operative Exchange Co. of Good Thunder 180 N.W. 231 Minn. 1920
Wagner v. Farmers Co-operative Exchange Co. of Good Thunder 180 N.W. 231 Minn. 1920
Barber v. Morris, 37 Minn. 194 , , 5 Am.
D'Autremont v. Anderson Iron Co. 116 N.W. 357 Minn. 1908
D'Autremont v. Anderson Iron Co. 116 N.W. 357 Minn. 1908
In Barber *171 v. Morris, 37 Minn. 194 , , 5 Am.
Holmes v. Loughren 105 N.W. 558 Minn. 1906
Holmes v. Loughren 105 N.W. 558 Minn. 1906
Barber v. Morris, 37 Minn. 194 , , 5 Am.
Gilmore v. Lampman 90 N.W. 1113 Minn. 1902
Gilmore v. Lampman 90 N.W. 1113 Minn. 1902
structive service by publication has been expressed in the following language: “Constructive service of process is purely a statutory creation, and in derogation of the common law, for which reason the requirements of the statute must be strictly observed, * * * and a failure to follow the statute will render the attempted service fatally defective.” Or, as stated in the case of Barber v. Morris, 37 Minn. 194 , : “The statute prescribes the means, through a constructive service of the summons, b
Bogart v. Kiene 88 N.W. 748 Minn. 1902
Bogart v. Kiene 88 N.W. 748 Minn. 1902
In Barber v. Morris, 37 Minn. 194 , , it affirmatively appeared that the affidavit was not filed until the date of the entry of the judgment.
Easton v. Childs 69 N.W. 903 Minn. 1897
Brattland v. Calkins 69 N.W. 699 Minn. 1897
Brattland v. Calkins 69 N.W. 699 Minn. 1897
Barber v. Morris, 37 Minn. 194 , ; Godfrey v. Valentine, 39 Minn. 336 , .
Jewett v. Iowa Land Co. 67 N.W. 639 Minn. 1896
Jewett v. Iowa Land Co. 67 N.W. 639 Minn. 1896
See, also, Barber v. Morris, 37 Minn. 194 , .
Corson v. Shoemaker 57 N.W. 134 Minn. 1893
Corson v. Shoemaker 57 N.W. 134 Minn. 1893
In the case of Barber v. Morris, 37 Minn. 194 , ( 33 N. W. Rep.
Hempsted v. Cargill 48 N.W. 686 Minn. 1891
Hempsted v. Cargill 48 N.W. 686 Minn. 1891
This conclusion is not in conflict with the decision in Barber v. Morris, 37 Minn. 194 , ( 33 N. W. Rep.
Cousins v. Alworth 47 N.W. 169 Minn. 1890
Cousins v. Alworth 47 N.W. 169 Minn. 1890
Barber v. Morris, 37 Minn. 194 , ( 33 N. W. Rep.
Bardwell v. Collins 46 N.W. 315 Minn. 1890
Bardwell v. Collins 46 N.W. 315 Minn. 1890
Barber v. Morris, 37 Minn. 194 , ( 33 N. W. Rep.
Nye v. Swan 44 N.W. 9 Minn. 1889
Nye v. Swan 44 N.W. 9 Minn. 1889
This is a different question from that decided in Barter v. Morris, 37 Minn. 194 , ( 33 N. W. Rep.
Godfrey v. Valentine 40 N.W. 163 Minn. 1888
Godfrey v. Valentine 40 N.W. 163 Minn. 1888
Barber v. Morris, 37 Minn. 194 , ( 33 N. W. Rep.
Brown v. St. Paul & Northern Pacific Railway Co. 38 N.W. 698 Minn. 1888

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by