Cited by

Nichols v. Walter, 37 Minn. 272 , .

of .county commissioners of such counties shall at their first meeting after the passage of this act nominate and appoint a county assessor, who shall fill such office * * * until the next general election to be held in the month of November, 1900, and until his successor is elected and qualified.” We have been over the whole subject of classification so often, particularly in Nichols v. Walter, 37 Minn. 264 , , and *534 State v. Cooley, 56 Minn. 540 , , that it is unnecessary now to do more tha

Nichols v. Walter, 37 Minn. 264 ; State v. Hammer, 42 N. J. L. 435.

Nichols v. Walter, 37 Minn. 264 , .

Nichols v. Walter, 37 Minn. 264 , ; Todd v. Rustad, 43 Minn. 500 , .

The legislature shall provide general laws for the transaction of any business that may be prohibited by section one of this amendment [section 33], and all such laws shall be uniform in their operation throughout the state.” It was said in the case of Nichols v. Walter, 37 Minn. 264 , , that this amendment completely abrogated said section 1 *525 of article 11, so far as it applied to the removal of county seats.

To avoid misapprehension, we wish, however, to say that we do not consider that question foreclosed by what was said in Nichols v. Walter, 37 Minn. 264 , .

Nichols v. Walter, 37 Minn. 264 , ; Allen v. Pioneer Press Co., 40 Minn. 117 , ; Lavallee v. St.

It seems clear to us the physical condition of things here stated constitutes such substantial distinctions “as to suggest the necessity of different legislation with respect to it.” *50 Nichols v. Walter, 37 Minn. 264 , ( ;) State ex rel.

Nichols v. Walter, 37 Minn. 264 , ( .)

403 ;) Nichols v. Walter, 37 Minn. 264 , ( 33 N. W. Rep.

The power of the legislature to pass this act, placing upon it the construction we have indicated, was settled in Nichols v. Walter, 37 Minn. 264 , ( 33 N. W. Rep.

The act appears to have been so drawn as to meet the objections to the act of 1885, (c. 272,) which were considered in Nichols v. Walter, 37 Minn. 264 , ( 33 N. W. Rep.

As said in State v. Hammer, 42 N. J. Law, 435, 440, “the true principle requires something more than a mere designation by such characteristics as will serve to classify.” What will justify placing subjects in different *482 classes for the purpose of applying different rules of law to them was stated in Nichols v. Walter, 37 Minn. 264, 272 , ( 33 N. W. Rep.

The practical limitation of the power to classify so as to avoid the imputation was stated by this court in Nichols v. Walter, 37 Minn. 264 , ( 33 N. W. Rep.