cl-8010539 Precedential Affirmed Processed

Morrill v. Madden

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed July 25, 1887 · 34 N.W. 25

Cited by

Authorities cited

Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.

Opinion text

By the Court. This ease, as now presented by an amended complaint, is deemed to be in no essential respect different from that-shown by the original complaint, which, upon a former appeal, was-decided to be insufficient to entitle the plaintiff to a remedy upon a judgment, after it had been suffered to expire by lapse of time. Mor *283 rill v. Madden, 35 Minn. 493 , ( 29 N. W. Rep. 193 .) For reasons set forth in our opinion in that case, the order sustaining this demurrer is affirmed.