Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Demars v. Musser-Sauntry Land, Logging & Manufacturing Co., 35 N.W. 1.

28 citing documents.

Addison Miller, Inc. v. American Central Insurance 249 N.W. 795 Minn. 1933
Addison Miller, Inc. v. American Central Insurance 249 N.W. 795 Minn. 1933
“The compromise of a disputed or doubtful claim is in itself a good consideration.” Demars v. Musser-Sauntry L. L. & M. Co. 37 Minn. 418, 419 , ; Sunset O. L. Co. v. Sherman N. Co. 121 Minn. 5 , ; 1 Dunnell, Minn. Dig.
Gorezki v. Ideal Creamery Co. 230 N.W. 128 Minn. 1930
Gorezki v. Ideal Creamery Co. 230 N.W. 128 Minn. 1930
Co. 37 Minn. 418 , ; Peterson v. Hegna, 158 Minn. 289 , ; Cairns v. Lewis, 169 Minn. 156 , .
Peoples State Bank of Cannon Falls v. Drake-Ballard Co. 205 N.W. 59 Minn. 1925
Peoples State Bank of Cannon Falls v. Drake-Ballard Co. 205 N.W. 59 Minn. 1925
Demars v. Musser-Sauntry L. L. & M. Co. 37 Minn. 418 , ; Peterson v. Hegna, 158 Minn. 289 , .
Thompson Yards, Inc. v. Jastrow 203 N.W. 960 Minn. 1925
Thompson Yards, Inc. v. Jastrow 203 N.W. 960 Minn. 1925
Other cases, which may be noted are DeMars v. Musser-Sauntry L. L. & M. Co. 37 Minn. 418 , ; Marion v. Heimbach, 62 Minn. 214 , ; Ness v. Minnesota & Colorado Co. 87 Minn. 413 , ; Hillestad v. Lee, 91 Minn. 335 , ; Hoidale v. Wood, 93 Minn. 190 , ; Foster County State Bank v. Lammers, 117 Minn. 94 , ; Isaacs v. Wishnick, 1
Olson v. Nannestad 203 N.W. 59 Minn. 1925
Olson v. Nannestad 203 N.W. 59 Minn. 1925
Demars v. Musser-Sauntry L. L. & M. Co. 37 Minn. 418 , ; Ness v. Minnesota & Colorado Co. 87 Minn. 413 , .
Minneapolis League of Catholic Women v. Schafhausen 202 N.W. 705 Minn. 1925
Minneapolis League of Catholic Women v. Schafhausen 202 N.W. 705 Minn. 1925
The case therefore, on this point, is not within the rule of Demars v. Musser-Sauntry L. & M. Co. 87 Minn. 418 , ; Ness v. Minnesota & Colorado Co. 87 Minn. 413 , , and other similar cases cited for defendant.
Peterson v. Hegna 197 N.W. 484 Minn. 1924
Peterson v. Hegna 197 N.W. 484 Minn. 1924
Co. 37 Minn. 418 , , approved in Hansen v. Gaar Scott & Co. 63 Minn. 94 , and Sunset Orchard Land Co. v. Sherman Nursery Co. 121 Minn. 5 , .
C. W. La Moure Co. v. Cuyuna-Mille Lacs Iron Co. 180 N.W. 540 Minn. 1920
C. W. La Moure Co. v. Cuyuna-Mille Lacs Iron Co. 180 N.W. 540 Minn. 1920
Isaacs v. Wishnick 162 N.W. 297 Minn. 1917
Isaacs v. Wishnick 162 N.W. 297 Minn. 1917
Demars v. Musser-Sauntry L. L. & M. Co. 37 Minn. 418 , ; Ness v. Minnesota & Colorado Co. 87 Minn. 413 , Demeules v. Jewell Tea Co. 103 Minn. 150 , , 14 L.R.A.(N.S.)
Sunset Orchard Land Co. v. Sherman Nursery Co. 140 N.W. 112 Minn. 1913
Sunset Orchard Land Co. v. Sherman Nursery Co. 140 N.W. 112 Minn. 1913
Demars v. Musser-Sauntry L. L. & M. Co. 37 Minn. 418 , ; Hall v. Wheeler, 37 Minn. 522 , ; Marion v. Heimbach, 62 Minn. 214 , ; Hansen v. Gaar, Scott & Co. 63 Minn. 94 , .
Kelley v. Hopkins 117 N.W. 396 Minn. 1908
Kelley v. Hopkins 117 N.W. 396 Minn. 1908
& M. Co., 37 Minn. 418 , .
Wright v. Lynch 112 N.W. 892 Minn. 1907
Wright v. Lynch 112 N.W. 892 Minn. 1907
Co., 37 Minn. 418 , ; Marion v. Heimbach, 62 Minn. 214 , ; Hansen v. Gaar, Scott & Co., 63 Minn. 94 , ; Ness v. Minnesota & Colo.
Ness v. Minnesota & Colorado Co. 92 N.W. 333 Minn. 1902
Ness v. Minnesota & Colorado Co. 92 N.W. 333 Minn. 1902
As was said in Demars v. Musser-Sauntry L. L. & M. Co., 37 Minn. 418 , : “A person cannot create a dispute sufficient as a consideration for a compromise by a mere refusal to pay an undisputed claim.
Hansen v. Gaar, Scott & Co. 65 N.W. 254 Minn. 1895
Hansen v. Gaar, Scott & Co. 65 N.W. 254 Minn. 1895
Demars v. Musser-Sauntry Land Co., 37 Minn. 418 , .