Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Coates v. Campbell, 35 N.W. 366.

24 citing documents.

PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. Fisher 132 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 1964
PORT AUTHORITY OF CITY OF ST. PAUL v. Fisher 132 N.W.2d 183 Minn. 1964
See, Coates v. Campbell, 37 Minn. 498 , , and Loan Assn. v. Topeka, 87 U. S. (20 Wall.)
Visina v. Freeman 89 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1958
Visina v. Freeman 89 N.W.2d 635 Minn. 1958
4 See, also, Coates v. Campbell, 37 Minn. 498 , ; 1 Cooley, Taxation (4 ed.) §§ 179 to 183.
Behrens v. City of Minneapolis 271 N.W. 814 Minn. 1937
Behrens v. City of Minneapolis 271 N.W. 814 Minn. 1937
Id., § 179; Burns v. Essling, 156 Minn. 171 , ; Coates v. Campbell, 37 Minn. 498 , .
Lyman v. Chase 226 N.W. 633 Minn. 1929
Lyman v. Chase 226 N.W. 633 Minn. 1929
Coates v. Campbell, 37 Minn. 498 , 35 N.W.
City of Tombstone v. MacIa 245 P. 677 Ariz. 1926
Burns v. Essling 194 N.W. 404 Minn. 1923
Burns v. Essling 194 N.W. 404 Minn. 1923
Coates v. Campbell, 37 Minn. 498 , ; Bates v. Bassett, 60 Vt. 530 , 15 Atl.
Inspiration Consolidated Copper Co. v. New Keystone Copper Co. 144 P. 277 Ariz. 1914
State ex rel. Arpin v. George 142 N.W. 945 Minn. 1913
State ex rel. Arpin v. George 142 N.W. 945 Minn. 1913
In State v. Foley, 30 Minn. 350 , ; Coates v. Campbell, 37 Minn. 498 , ; Rippe v. Becker, 56 Minn. 100 , , 22 L.R.A.
Bell v. Kirkland 113 N.W. 271 Minn. 1907
Bell v. Kirkland 113 N.W. 271 Minn. 1907
Co., 80 Minn. 108 , , 50 L. R. A. 656); to pay money to aid in building a shoe factory within its limits (City of Chaska v. Hedman, 53 Minn. 525 , ); to aid in the construction of a dam for the purpose of improving a private water power (Coates v. Campbell, 37 Minn. 498 , ); to construct a building for the use of another municipality or other third person (Borough of Henderson v. County of Sibley, 28 Minn. 515 , ; Village of Glencoe v. County of McLeod, 40 Minn. 44 , ); or without authority to b
Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co. 107 N.W. 405 Minn. 1906
Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Koochiching Co. 107 N.W. 405 Minn. 1906
The principle is recognized in Coates v. Campbell, 37 Minn. 498 , , and in Stewart v. Great Northern Ry.
Castner v. City of Minneapolis 99 N.W. 361 Minn. 1904
Castner v. City of Minneapolis 99 N.W. 361 Minn. 1904
State v. Foley, 30 Minn. 350 , ; Borough of Henderson v. County of Sibley, 28 Minn. 515 , ; Coates v. Campbell, 37 Minn. 498 , ; City of Chaska v. Hedman, 53 Minn. 525 , ; City of Fergus Falls v. Fergus Falls Hotel Co., 80 Minn. 165 , .
Minnesota Sugar Co. v. Iverson 97 N.W. 454 Minn. 1903
Minnesota Sugar Co. v. Iverson 97 N.W. 454 Minn. 1903
And the Attorney General also contends that the whole question involved in this case has already been determined by this court in each of the following cases: State v. Foley, 30 Minn. 350 , ; Coates v. Campbell, 37 Minn. 498 , ; Rippe v. Becker, 56 Minn. 100 , ; Wm.
William Deering & Co. v. Peterson 77 N.W. 568 Minn. 1898
William Deering & Co. v. Peterson 77 N.W. 568 Minn. 1898
It was held in Coates v. Campbell, 37 Minn. 498 , , *124 that a village cannot issue bonds to aid in an enterprise partly public and partly private.