Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Witt v. St. Paul & Northern Pacific Railway Co., 35 N.W. 862.

33 citing documents.

State Ex Rel. Department of Natural Resources v. Hess 684 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 2004
Resler v. Rogers 139 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 1965
Resler v. Rogers 139 N.W.2d 379 Minn. 1965
In Re Application of Mareck to Register Title 257 Minn. 222 Minn. 1960
In Re Application of Mareck to Register Title 257 Minn. 222 Minn. 1960
Co., 38 Minn. 122 , ( 35 N.W.
Johnson v. Mason 31 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1948
Johnson v. Mason 31 N.W.2d 910 Minn. 1948
Co. 38 Minn. 122, 128 , .
First National Bank v. Northwestern Trust Co. 231 N.W. 790 Minn. 1930
First National Bank v. Northwestern Trust Co. 231 N.W. 790 Minn. 1930
Co. 38 Minn. 122, 127 , , 861: “The cardinal rule of construction is to ascertain and give effect to the■ intention of the parties to the deed; and to this end the court must consider all parts of the instrument, and the construction must be upon the entire deed, and not upon disjointed parts of it.
Midland Trust & Savings Bank v. Nagle 184 N.W. 1028 Minn. 1921
Midland Trust & Savings Bank v. Nagle 184 N.W. 1028 Minn. 1921
Co. 38 Minn. 122 , , it was said that the cardinal rule of construction is to ascertain and give effect to the intention of the parties to -the deed, and to this end the court must consider all parts of the instrument.
International Lumber Co. v. Staude 175 N.W. 909 Minn. 1919
International Lumber Co. v. Staude 175 N.W. 909 Minn. 1919
Co. 38 Minn. 122 , ; St.
Trustees of First Presbyterian Church v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 158 N.W. 709 Minn. 1916
Trustees of First Presbyterian Church v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 158 N.W. 709 Minn. 1916
Co. 38 Minn. 122 , ; Adolph v. Minneapolis & Pacific Ry.
Norton v. Duluth Transfer Railway Co. 151 N.W. 907 Minn. 1915
Norton v. Duluth Transfer Railway Co. 151 N.W. 907 Minn. 1915
Sandretto v. Wahlsten 144 N.W. 1089 Minn. 1914
Sandretto v. Wahlsten 144 N.W. 1089 Minn. 1914
Co. 38 Minn. 122, 127 , .
Baldwin v. Fisher 124 N.W. 1094 Minn. 1910
Baldwin v. Fisher 124 N.W. 1094 Minn. 1910
Lawton v. Joesting 104 N.W. 830 Minn. 1905
Lawton v. Joesting 104 N.W. 830 Minn. 1905
Co., 38 Minn. 122 , , such rules of construction in modern times have given way to the more sensible rule, which is, in all cases, to give effect to the intention of the parties, if practicable, when no principle of law is thereby violated.
Kray v. Muggli 86 N.W. 882 Minn. 1901
Kray v. Muggli 86 N.W. 882 Minn. 1901
Flaten v. Moorhead 53 N.W. 807 Minn. 1892
Flaten v. Moorhead 53 N.W. 807 Minn. 1892
Co., 38 Minn. 122 , ( 35 N. W. Rep.
Ramsey v. Glenny 48 N.W. 322 Minn. 1891
Ramsey v. Glenny 48 N.W. 322 Minn. 1891
Co., 38 Minn. 122, 129 , ( 35 N. W. Rep.
Cannon v. Emmans 46 N.W. 356 Minn. 1890
Cannon v. Emmans 46 N.W. 356 Minn. 1890
Co., 38 Minn. 122, 127 , ( 35 N. W. Rep.
Grueber v. Lindenmeier 43 N.W. 964 Minn. 1889
Grueber v. Lindenmeier 43 N.W. 964 Minn. 1889
Co., 38 Minn. 122 , ( 35 N. W. Rep.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by