Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bausman v. Kelley, 36 N.W. 333.

37 citing documents.

Group Health, Inc. v. Heuer 499 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Group Health, Inc. v. Heuer 499 N.W.2d 526 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Cf. Bausman v. Kelley, 38 Minn. 197, 205 , 36 N.W.
Aronovitch v. Levy 56 N.W.2d 570 Minn. 1953
Aronovitch v. Levy 56 N.W.2d 570 Minn. 1953
But, where there is no estoppel, his legal remedies will be barred only by the statute of limitations.” In Bausman v. Kelley, 38 Minn. 197, 207 , , we said: “* * * He [who seeks equitable relief] cannot invoke equitable relief and at the same time insist that the court shall not regard any fact in the conduct or relations of the parties which may show his suit to be inequitable and against conscience.” And in State v. Brooks-Scanlon Lbr
Cantieny v. Boze 296 N.W. 491 Minn. 1941
Cantieny v. Boze 296 N.W. 491 Minn. 1941
Bausman v. Kelley, 38 Minn. 197 , , 8 A. S. R. 661; Lloyd v. Simons, 97 Minn. 315 , .
Keough v. St. Paul Milk Co. 285 N.W. 809 Minn. 1939
Keough v. St. Paul Milk Co. 285 N.W. 809 Minn. 1939
Bausman v. Kelley, 38 Minn. 197 , 36 N.W.
Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Page 251 N.W. 911 Minn. 1933
Union Central Life Insurance v. Page 251 N.W. 911 Minn. 1933
Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Page 251 N.W. 911 Minn. 1933
D. 787 ; Bausman v. Kelley, 38 Minn. 197 , 36 N.W.
Union Central Life Insurance v. Page 251 N.W. 911 Minn. 1933
D. 787 ; Bausman v. Kelley, 38 Minn. 197 , , 8 A. S. R. 661; Redin v. Branhan, 43 Minn. 283 , .
Briggs v. Buzzell 264 N.W. 548 Minn. 1925
Briggs v. Buzzell 264 N.W. 548 Minn. 1925
Bausman v. Kelley, 38 Minn. 197 , , 8 Am.
Wood v. Newell 182 N.W. 965 Minn. 1921
Wood v. Newell 182 N.W. 965 Minn. 1921
It was so held in Bausman v. Kelley, 38 Minn. 197 , , 8 Am.
Beitz v. Buendiger 174 N.W. 440 Minn. 1919
Beitz v. Buendiger 174 N.W. 440 Minn. 1919
Bausman v. Kelley, 38 Minn. 197, 209 , , 8 Am.
State v. Brooks-Scanlon Lumber Co. 142 N.W. 717 Minn. 1913
State v. Brooks-Scanlon Lumber Co. 142 N.W. 717 Minn. 1913
(2d ed.) 102; Bausman v. Kelley, 38 Minn. 197 , , 8 Am.
Finley v. Erickson 142 N.W. 198 Minn. 1913
Finley v. Erickson 142 N.W. 198 Minn. 1913
A foreclosure sale involving a very valuable tract of land in the city of Minneapolis was attacked for practically the same reason as in this case, and it was sought to sustain the foreclosure under said chapter 112 of Laws of 1883, Bausman v. Kelley, 38 Minn. 197 , , but the court held that publishing the notice of sale in the name of a dead man was not one of the defects covered by said chapter.
Whipple v. Christie 141 N.W. 1107 Minn. 1913
Macomber v. Kinney 128 N.W. 1001 Minn. 1910
Macomber v. Kinney 128 N.W. 1001 Minn. 1910
The previous rulings of this court, however, imposed on this plaintiff the duty, under the circumstances here presented, of taking affirmative action whereby warning would be given possible purchasers relying on the record title of the claimants of the land Bausman v. Kelley, 38 Minn. 197 , , 8 Am.
Simonton v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance 95 N.W. 451 Minn. 1903
Simonton v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance 95 N.W. 451 Minn. 1903
Bausman v. Kelley, 38 Minn. 197 , .
Clark v. Mitchell 84 N.W. 327 Minn. 1900
Clark v. Mitchell 84 N.W. 327 Minn. 1900
It is true that the foreclosure by advertisement of a mortgage cannot be made in the name of the deceased mortgagee (Bausman v. Kelley, 38 Minn. 197 , ); but the application of this rule to the conditions in this case is not apparent, for the reason, at least, that it does not appear that the trustee owners of the legal estate had fully executed their trust under the original will.
Hathorn v. Butler 75 N.W. 743 Minn. 1898
Hathorn v. Butler 75 N.W. 743 Minn. 1898
See also Bausman v. Kelley, 38 Minn. 197 , .
Bausman v. Faue 48 N.W. 13 Minn. 1891
Bausman v. Faue 48 N.W. 13 Minn. 1891
This, as decided in Bausman v. Kelley, 38 Minn. 197 , ( 36 N. W. Rep.
Nauer v. Benham 47 N.W. 796 Minn. 1891
Nauer v. Benham 47 N.W. 796 Minn. 1891
Bausman v. Kelley, 38 Minn. 197 , ( 36 N. W. Rep.
Welsh v. Cooley 46 N.W. 908 Minn. 1890
Welsh v. Cooley 46 N.W. 908 Minn. 1890
Within the decision in Bausman v. Kelley, 38 Minn. 197 , ( 36 N. W. Rep.