Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite County of Brown v. Winona & St. Peter Land Co., 37 N.W. 949.
- Emme v. C.O.M.B., Inc. 418 N.W.2d 176 Minn. 1988
-
Emme v. C.O.M.B., Inc.
418 N.W.2d 176
Minn. 1988
Peter Land Co., 38 Minn. 397, 399 , 37 N.W.
- Bahr v. City of Litchfield 404 N.W.2d 381 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
-
Bahr v. City of Litchfield
404 N.W.2d 381
Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Peter Land Co., 38 Minn. 397, 399 , 37 N.W.
- Appeal of O'Rourke 220 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1974
- Stolp v. Scrimshaw 220 N.W.2d 811 Minn. 1974
-
Appeal of O'Rourke
220 N.W.2d 811
Minn. 1974
Peter Land Co., 38 Minn. 397 , 37 N.W.
-
Stolp v. Scrimshaw
220 N.W.2d 811
Minn. 1974
Peter Land Co. 38 Minn. 397 , is the case most commonly cited for the proposition that the constitution created an individual right of appeal, mandating this court to hear and determine any and all appeals.
- Ridgway v. Vaughan 246 N.W. 115 Minn. 1932
-
Ridgway v. Vaughan
246 N.W. 115
Minn. 1932
Peter Land Co. 38 Minn. 397 , , there is a constitutional right to review in the supreme court notwithstanding the failure of the statute to provide for an appeal or deny one, the evident reference being to certiorari as offering the method of review.
- State Ex Rel. City of Minneapolis v. Boucher 214 N.W. 30 Minn. 1927
-
State Ex Rel. City of Minneapolis v. Boucher
214 N.W. 30
Minn. 1927
P. L. Co. 38 Minn. 397 , .
- Flour City Fuel & Transfer Co. v. Young 185 N.W. 934 Minn. 1921
-
Flour City Fuel & Transfer Co. v. Young
185 N.W. 934
Minn. 1921
P. Land Co. 38 Minn. 397 , .
- Kroning v. St. Paul City Railway Co. 104 N.W. 888 Minn. 1905
-
Kroning v. St. Paul City Railway Co.
104 N.W. 888
Minn. 1905
Peter Rand Co., 38 Minn. 397 , ; State v. Leftwich, 41 Minn. 42 , .
- State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners v. Dunn 90 N.W. 772 Minn. 1902
-
State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners v. Dunn
90 N.W. 772
Minn. 1902
Peter Land Co., 38 Minn. 397, 399 , , — a case involving the effect of a statutory provision that a real estate tax judgment shall be final, unless certified to the supreme court by the district court upon specific questions, — it was said: “The legislature may prescribe the mode by which a cause is to be brought to this court, eithe
- State v. Red River Valley Elevator Co. 72 N.W. 60 Minn. 1897
-
State v. Red River Valley Elevator Co.
72 N.W. 60
Minn. 1897
County v. Winona, 38 Minn. 397 , .
- County of Redwood v. Winona & St. Peter Land Co. 43 N.W. 1152 Minn. 1889
-
County of Redwood v. Winona & St. Peter Land Co.
43 N.W. 1152
Minn. 1889
Peter Land Co., 38 Minn. 397 , ( 37 N. W. Rep.
- State v. Leftwich 42 N.W. 598 Minn. 1889
- County of Redwood v. Winona & St. Peter Land Co. 41 N.W. 465 Minn. 1889
-
County of Redwood v. Winona & St. Peter Land Co.
41 N.W. 465
Minn. 1889
Peter Land Co., 38 Minn. 397 , ( 37 N. W. Rep.
- County of Brown v. Winona & St. Peter Land Co. 40 N.W. 166 Minn. 1888
-
Followed
County of Brown v. Winona & St. Peter Land Co.
40 N.W. 166
Minn. 1888
Peter Land Co., 38 Minn. 397 , ( 37 N. W. Rep.