Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Simpson v. Rapp, 38 N.W. 926.
- Debra L. Cich, et al., petitioners, Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
- Minneapolis Community Development Agency v. Opus Northwest, LLC 582 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
- Matter of MCDA 582 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
-
Matter of MCDA
582 N.W.2d 596
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Simpson v. Rapp, 39 Minn. 65, 67 , 38 N.W.
-
Minneapolis Community Development Agency v. Opus Northwest, LLC
582 N.W.2d 596
Minn. Ct. App. 1998
Simpson v. Rapp, 39 Minn. 65, 67 , 38 N.W.
- State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Baillon Co. 503 N.W.2d 799 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
-
State Ex Rel. Humphrey v. Baillon Co.
503 N.W.2d 799
Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Simpson v. Rapp, 39 Minn. 65, 67 , 38 N.W.
- Electric Short Line Terminal Co. v. City of Minneapolis 64 N.W.2d 149 Minn. 1954
-
Electric Short Line Terminal Co. v. City of Minneapolis
64 N.W.2d 149
Minn. 1954
Simpson v. Rapp, 39 Minn. 65 , ; City of St.
- In Re Condemnation of Lands Owned by Luhrs 19 N.W.2d 77 Minn. 1945
- In re Burnquist 220 Minn. 129 Minn. 1945
-
In re Burnquist
220 Minn. 129
Minn. 1945
Simpson v. Rapp, 39 Minn. 65, 67 , , Mr. Justice Mitchell characterizes such proceedings as follows: “* * * Condemnatory proceedings in the exercise of the right of eminent domain are not civil actions or causes within the meaning of the constitution, but special proceedings, only quasi judicial in their nature, whether conducte
-
In Re Condemnation of Lands Owned by Luhrs
19 N.W.2d 77
Minn. 1945
Simpson v. Rapp, 39 Minn. 65 , 67 , 38 N.W.
- Burnquist v. Cook 19 N.W.2d 394 Minn. 1945
- Freeman v. Township of Pine City 286 N.W. 299 Minn. 1939
-
Freeman v. Township of Pine City
286 N.W. 299
Minn. 1939
Simpson v. Rapp, 39 Minn. 65 , .
- Barmel v. Minneapolis-Saint Paul Sanitary District 277 N.W. 208 Minn. 1938
-
Barmel v. Minneapolis-Saint Paul Sanitary District
277 N.W. 208
Minn. 1938
Simpson v. Rapp, 39 Minn. 65, 67 , , this court, again speaking through Mr. Justice Mitchell, used the following language: “Condemnatory proceedings in the exercise of the right of eminent domain are not civil actions or causes within the meaning of the constitution, but special proceedings, only quasi judicial in their nature
- State Ex Rel. Benson v. Erickson 239 N.W. 908 Minn. 1931
-
State Ex Rel. Benson v. Erickson
239 N.W. 908
Minn. 1931
Simpson v. Rapp, 39 Minn. 65, 67 , .
- In Re Improvement of Third Street, St. Paul 225 N.W. 86 Minn. 1929
-
In Re Improvement of Third Street, St. Paul
225 N.W. 86
Minn. 1929
In the case of State v. Rapp, 39 Minn. 65, 67 , , the court said: “Condemnatory proceedings in the exercise of the right of eminent domain are not civil actions or causes within the meaning of the constitution; but special proceedings, only quasi judicial in their nature, whether conducted by judicial or non-judicial officers or tribunals.
- Martinson v. Town of Eagle Creek 152 N.W. 761 Minn. 1915
-
Martinson v. Town of Eagle Creek
152 N.W. 761
Minn. 1915
Elliott, Roads & Streets, § 380; State v. Rapp, 39 Minn. 65 , ; State v. Hager, 119 Minn. 512 , ; Page v. Boehmer, 154 Mich.
- State ex rel. Smith v. Van Reed 145 N.W. 967 Minn. 1914
-
State ex rel. Smith v. Van Reed
145 N.W. 967
Minn. 1914
of State Park v. Henry, 38 Minn. 266 , ; State v. Rapp, 39 Minn. 65 , ; Fairchild v. City of St.
- Town of Great Scott v. Robinson 132 N.W. 204 Minn. 1911
-
Town of Great Scott v. Robinson
132 N.W. 204
Minn. 1911
State v. Rapp, 39 Minn. 65 , ; State v. Thompson, 46 Minn. 302 , ; Thompson v. Town of Berlin, 87 Minn. 7 , .
- McGee v. Board of County Commissioners 88 N.W. 6 Minn. 1901
-
McGee v. Board of County Commissioners
88 N.W. 6
Minn. 1901
State v. Ensign, 55 Minn. 278 , ; City of Duluth v. Dibblee, 62 Minn. 18 , ; State v. Rapp, 39 Minn. 65 , ; State v. District Court, supra.