Cited by

Co., -78 (Minn. 1888) (holding that an insurance company had waived a contract’s requirement of written notice of abandonment by orally assuring plaintiff that its property was insured, even though the contract had a provision against oral waivers); see also Larson v. Hill’s Heating & Refrigeration of Bemidji, Inc.

Co., 39 Minn. 129, 130-32 , 39 N.W.

In Lamberton v. Connecticut Fire Insurance Co., 39 Minn. 129 , 39 N.W.

Co. 39 Minn. 129 , , 1 L. R. A. 222; Whitney v. National M. A. Assn. 57 Minn. 472 , ; Otte v. Hartford L. Ins.

Co. 39 Minn. 129 , , 1 L. R. A. 222, where “confessedly, the agent whose conduct is in question, had authority to give such consent by indorsing the same upon the policy.” In that case a vacancy permit.

Co., 39 Minn. 129 , , 1 L. R. A. 222; Anderson v. Manchester Fire Assurance Co., 59 Minn. 182 , , , 28 L. R. A. 609, 50 Am.

Co., 39 Minn. 129 , ; Hartley v. Pennsylvania F. Ins.

Co., 39 Minn. 129 , ( ,) the court passed upon a condition similar to the condition last above quoted, and held it to be not an attempt to limit or restrict the power of any particular agent or class of agents, but to disable one of the parties to make, even with the consent of the other, an agreement that would otherwise b

Co., 39 Minn. 129 , ( 39 N. W. Rep.