Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Bazille v. Murray, 41 N.W. 238.

28 citing documents.

Mary Ann Karnowski v. Thomas George Wimmer Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Mary Ann Karnowski v. Thomas George Wimmer Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-37 & n.1 (Minn. App. 1990), rev. denied (Minn. June 15, 1990).
Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout 124 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1963
Youngstown Mines Corp. v. Prout 124 N.W.2d 328 Minn. 1963
Bazille v. Murray, 40 Minn. 48 , ; Swank v. St.
Romans v. Nadler 14 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 1944
Romans v. Nadler 14 N.W.2d 482 Minn. 1944
Krueger v. Market, 124 Minn. 393 , ; Bazille v. Murray, 40 Minn. 48 , ; 2 C. J. S., Adverse Possession, §§ 24, 125b.
Melady-Briggs Cattle Corp. v. Drovers State Bank 6 N.W.2d 454 Minn. 1942
Melady-Briggs Cattle Corp. v. Drovers State Bank 6 N.W.2d 454 Minn. 1942
Thompson v. Myrick, 24 Minn. 4 ; Bazille v. *309 Murray, 40 Minn. 48 , ; Swank v. St.
Florance v. Goslin 186 N.W. 691 Minn. 1922
Florance v. Goslin 186 N.W. 691 Minn. 1922
Barber v. Robinson, 78 Minn. 193 , ; Sage v. Larson, 69 Minn. 122 , ; Bazille v. Murray, 40 Minn. 48 , ; Cain v. Highland Co. 134 Minn. 430 , 159 N. *274 W. 830, 872 .
McKnight v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 149 N.W. 131 Minn. 1914
McKnight v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. 149 N.W. 131 Minn. 1914
673; Bazille v. Murray, 40 Minn. 48 , ; Northern Trust Co. v. Crystal Lake Cemetery Assn. 67 Minn. 131 , ; O’Brien v. Manwaring, 79 Minn. 86 , , 79 Am.
Sheets v. Ramer 145 N.W. 787 Minn. 1914
Sheets v. Ramer 145 N.W. 787 Minn. 1914
See Doyle v. Hallam, 21 Minn. 515 ; Bazille v. Murray, 40 Minn. 48 , ; Wagener v. City of St.
Krueger v. Market 145 N.W. 30 Minn. 1914
Krueger v. Market 145 N.W. 30 Minn. 1914
“The mere cutting and removal of timber or fuel or natural grass from unoccupied land have not generally, and under ordinary circumstances, been regarded as constituting adverse possession.” Costello v. Edson, 44 Minn. 135 , ; Bazille v. Murray, 40 Minn. 48 , ; Washburn v. Cutter, 17 Minn. 335 (361); McRoberts v. McArthur, 62 Minn. 310 , .
Tew v. Webster 136 N.W. 1098 Minn. 1912
Tew v. Webster 136 N.W. 1098 Minn. 1912
“It is not the fruit of the litigation that constitutes the estoppel, but the facts put in issue and found, upon which the recovery is based.” Bazille v. Murray, 40 Minn. 48 , .
Russell-Sage v. Larson 71 N.W. 923 Minn. 1897
Russell-Sage v. Larson 71 N.W. 923 Minn. 1897
Bazille v. Murray, 40 Minn. 48 , ; Lambert v. Stees, 47 Minn. 141 , .
Northern Trust Co. v. Crystal Lake Cemetery Ass'n 69 N.W. 708 Minn. 1897
Northern Trust Co. v. Crystal Lake Cemetery Ass'n 69 N.W. 708 Minn. 1897
See, also, Bazille v. Murray, 40 Minn. 48 , .
Veline v. Dahlquist 66 N.W. 141 Minn. 1896
Veline v. Dahlquist 66 N.W. 141 Minn. 1896
Bazille v. Murray, 40 Minn. 48 , ; Swank v. St.
Cameron v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 53 N.W. 199 Minn. 1892
Cameron v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 53 N.W. 199 Minn. 1892
See Doyle v. Hallam, 21 Minn. 515 ; Bazille v. Murray, 40 Minn. 48 , ( 41 N. W. Rep.
Lambert v. Stees 49 N.W. 662 Minn. 1891
Distinguished Lambert v. Stees 49 N.W. 662 Minn. 1891
A finding to the contrary, upon evidence of similar acts, such as annually cutting hay, was sustained in Bazille v. Murray, 40 Minn. 48 , ( 41 N. W. Rep.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by