Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State ex rel. Railroad & Warehouse Commission v. Minneapolis Eastern Railway Co., 41 N.W. 465.

32 citing documents.

United States Steel Corp. v. State 324 N.W.2d 638 Minn. 1982
Peter Land Co., 40 Minn. 512 , was a case dealing with taxation of property which had escaped proper assessment for about 17 years.
State v. Bies 103 N.W.2d 228 Minn. 1960
Peter Land Co. 40 Minn. 512 , , , affirmed, 159 U. S. 526 , 16 S. Ct. 83 , 40 L. ed. 247.
Lindahl v. State 70 N.W.2d 866 Minn. 1955
Peter Land Co. 40 Minn. 512 , , .
Borchardt v. Kulick 48 N.W.2d 318 Minn. 1951
Waite v. McKelvy, 71 Minn. 167 , ; Laybourn v. Zinns, 92 Minn. 208 , ; Bowers v. Whitney, 88 Minn. 168 , ; Fontaine v. Bush, 40 Minn. 141 , .
Oleson v. County of Chippewa 31 N.W.2d 432 Minn. 1948
P. Land Co. 40 Minn. 512 , 518 , , 42 N.W.
Lappinen v. Union Ore Co. 29 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 1947
P. Land Co. 40 Minn. 512 , , , affirmed, 159 U. S. 526 , 16 S. Ct. 83 , 40 L. ed. 247 (liability to pay taxes on land omitted during certain years, where there was no default); Sibley v. County of Pine, 31 Minn. 201 , (money held under mistake of fact- — -no liability for interest prior to a demand) ; Ratner v. Hill, 2
Lund v. Larsen 24 N.W.2d 827 Minn. 1946
P. Land Co. 40 Minn. 512 , , (affirmed, 159 U. S. 526 , 16 S. Ct. 83 , 40 L. ed. 247); Mason v. Callender, Flint & Co. 2 Minn. 302 (350), 72 Am.
In Re Petition of S. R. A., Inc. 7 N.W.2d 484 Minn. 1942
P. Land Co. 40 Minn. 512, 517 , , , 475: “The taxing power, when acting within its legitimate sphere, is one which knows no stopping-place until it has accomplished the purpose for which it exists, viz., the actual enforcement and collection from every lawful object of taxation of its proportionate share of the public burdens; and, if p
State v. Illinois Central Railroad Co. 284 N.W. 360 Minn. 1939
P. Land Co.] 40 Minn. 512 , , , or where the tax levied is excessive, State v. G. N. Ry.
Henslin v. Wingen 280 N.W. 281 Minn. 1938
§ 3231; Fontaine v. Bush, 40 Minn. 141 , , 12 A. S. R. 722; Hoyt v. Duluth & I. R. R. Co. 103 Minn. 396 , ; Clark v. Marvin, 140 Minn. 285 , ; Johnson v. Holmes, 142 Minn. 54 , .
Schmahl v. School District No. 12 274 N.W. 168 Minn. 1937
Peter Land Co. 40 Minn. 512 , , .
Hoppman v. Persha 248 N.W. 281 Minn. 1933
1927, §§ 8459, 8460; Tatge v. Tatge, 34 Minn. 272 , , ; Fontaine v. Bush, 40 Minn. 141 , , 12 A. S. R. 722; Burns v. Fidelity R. E. Co. 52 Minn. 31 , ; Bean v. Lamprey, 82 Minn. 320 , ; Hanson v. Marion, 128 Minn. 468 , ; Consumers Grain Co. v. Wm.
Strizich v. Zenith Furnace Co. 223 N.W. 926 Minn. 1929
P. L. Co. 40 Minn. 512 , , .
State v. O'Connell 211 N.W. 945 Minn. 1927
P. L. Co. 40 Minn. 512, 513 , , , a case involving omitted real estate.
State v. Hughes Bros. Timber Co. 203 N.W. 436 Minn. 1925
Peter Land Co. 40 Minn. 512 , , , neither interest nor penalties can be imposed upon the taxpayer until he defaults in payment.
Bundy v. Voelker 175 N.W. 1000 Minn. 1920
Co. 39 Minn. 145 , ; Fontaine v. Bush, 40 Minn. 141 , , 12 Am.
State v. Security National Bank 173 N.W. 885 Minn. 1919
Peter Land Co. 40 Minn. 512, 517 , , , as follows: “The taxing power, when acting within its legitimate sphere, is one which knows no stopping-place until it has accomplished the purpose for which it exists, viz., the actual enforcement and collection from every lawful object of taxation of its proportionate share of the public burdens; an
State ex rel. Brown v. Board of Public Works 158 N.W. 977 Minn. 1916
Peter Land Co. 40 Minn. 512, 519 , .
State v. Foster 116 N.W. 826 Minn. 1908
Peter Land Co., 40 Minn. 512 , , .
Jenks v. Henningsen 113 N.W. 903 Minn. 1907
P. Land Co., 40 Minn. 512 , , .
State v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 103 N.W. 731 Minn. 1905
Peter Land Co., 40 Minn. 512, 524 , , .
Followed McMillan v. Board of County Commissioners 100 N.W. 384 Minn. 1904
P. L. Co., 40 Minn. 512 , .
State ex rel. Vossen v. Eberhard 95 N.W. 1115 Minn. 1903
Peter Land Co., 40 Minn. 512 , , .
Bean v. Lamprey 84 N.W. 1016 Minn. 1901
Tatge v. Tatge, 34 Minn. 272, 274 , , ; Fontaine v. Bush, 40 Minn. 141 , ; Iverson v. Cirkel, 56 Minn. 299 , .
State v. Bellin 81 N.W. 763 Minn. 1900
P. L. Co., 40 Minn. 512 , , and ; Mower Co. v. Crane, 51 Minn. 201 , ; Pine Co. v. Lambert; 57 Minn. 203 , ; Kipp v. Elwell, 65 Minn. 525 , .
State v. Sage 78 N.W. 14 Minn. 1899
P. Land Co., 40 Minn. 512 , , and ), but claims that these proceedings were commenced in due time.
Waite v. McKelvy 73 N.W. 727 Minn. 1898
Taylor v. Mueller, 30 Minn. 343 , ; Fontaine v. Bush, 40 Minn. 141 , ; Shindler v. Houston, 49 Am.
State v. Kipp 73 N.W. 164 Minn. 1897
County v. Winona, 40 Minn. 512 , , and , was a case where it was attempted to assess lands for taxes for past years, for which the lands had never been assessed at all.
State v. Weyerhauser 68 Minn. 353 Minn. 1897
We are of the opinion that this question has been settled by the case of County v. Winona, 40 Minn. 512 , *361 , and , and affirmed on appeal to the United States supreme court, 159 U. S. 526 ,16 Sup.
City of Duluth v. Dibblee 63 N.W. 1117 Minn. 1895
P. Land Co., 40 Minn. 512 , , and ; Davidson v. New Orleans, 96 U. S. 97 .
Pine County v. Lambert 58 N.W. 990 Minn. 1894
P. Land Co., 40 Minn. 512 , ( , ;) Mower Co. v. Crane, 51 Minn. 201 , ( .)
Iverson v. Cirkel 57 N.W. 800 Minn. 1894
Had counsel intended to rely upon the statute as a defense, they should have done one of two things: They should have rested upon the general denial found in the answer, which denial was sufficient to put plaintiffs upon proof of a valid agreement, Fontaine v. Bush, 40 Minn. 141 , ( ,) or they should have qualified their further allegations respecting the contract which they alleged was made with plaintiffs.