Cited by

Martin v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , ; Mousseau v. Mousseau, 40 Minn. 236 , ; Comstock v. Matthews, 55 Minn. 111 , ; 21 Minn. L. Rev. 211 ; 23 Id.

The title acquired by the proceedings must be impeached, if at all, in such other tribunal.” This court in the case of Mosseau v. Mosseau, 40 Minn. 236, 239 , , in referring to the case of State ex rel.

This court in the case of Mosseau v. Mosseau, 40 Minn. 236 , 239 , 41 N.W.

R. 59; Hurley v. Hamilton, 37 Minn. 160 , ; Mosseau v. Mosseau, 40 Minn. 236 , ; Peterson v. Baillif, 52 Minn. 386 , ; Hause v. O’Leary, 136 Minn. 126, 132 , ; Rux v. Adam, 143 Minn. 35 (see subd.

The determination and enforcement of such rights is ordinarily beyond the jurisdiction of the probate court; and they are unaffected by a decree of the probate court determining the devolution of the property of the decedent, at least unless they have been submitted to that court for determination.” Among the authorities cited is Mousseau v. Mousseau, 40 Minn. 236 , .

Lindekugel v. Probate Court, 33 Minn. 94 , ; Mousseau v. Mousseau, 40 Minn. 236 , ; Wilson v. Erickson, 147 Minn. 260 , ; O’Brien v. Lien, 160 Minn. 276 , ; A. L. Goetzmann Co. v. Gazett, 172 Minn. 68 , .

Mousseau v. Mousseau, 40 Minn. 236 , ; Fiske v. Lawton, 124 Minn. 85 , .

Comstock v. Matthews, 55 Minn. 111 , ; Mousseau v. Mousseau, 40 Minn. 236 , .

State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , ; State v. Probate Court of Sibley County, 33 Minn. 94 , ; Mousseau v. Mousseau, 40 Minn. 236 , ; Appleby v. Watkins, 95 Minn. 455 , , 5 Ann. Cas.

& 1916 Supp. §§ 7770-7779; Mousseau v. Mousseau, 40 Minn. 236 , ; State v. Probate *345 Court of Ramsey County, 103 Minn. 325 , ; Wellner v. Eckstein, 105 Minn. 444 , ; Brown v. Strom, 113 Minn. 1 , ; Fiske v. Lawton, 124 Minn. 85 , .

State v. Ueland, 30 Minn. 277 , ; Culver v. Hardenbergh, 37 Minn. 225 , ; Mousseau v. Mousseau, 40 Minn. 236 , ; Brandes v. Carpenter, 68 Minn. 388 , ; Betcher v. Betcher, 83 Minn. 215 , ; Fitzpatrick v. Simonson Bros. Mnfg.

Mousseau v. Mosseau, 40 Minn. 236 , ; Haataja v. Saarenpaa, 118 Minn. 255 , ; Svanburg v. Fosseen, 75 Minn. 350 , , 43 L.R.A.

59 ; Mousseau v. Mousseau, 40 Minn. 236 , ; Comstock, v. Matthews, 55 Minn. *8 111 , State v. Probate Court of Ramsey County, 103 Minn. 325 , .

Mousseau v. Mousseau, 40 Minn. 236 , .

Another case which illustrates the limit of the jurisdiction of the probate court is Mousseau v. Mousseau, 40 Minn. 236 , , where it was held that the court had jurisdiction to direct the administrator or executor to make a conveyance, when it appeared that there was no reason why it should not be made; but it was expressly, stated that the court had no jurisdiction to determine the merits of a controversy between the vend

In Mousseau v. Mousseau, 40 Minn. 236 , , it was held that, while the probate court had jurisdiction to direct an executor to enter into a conveyance of real estate which his testator had bound himself in writing to make during his lifetime, still the court was without jurisdiction to decide against a party applying for such a conveyance.

Mousseau v. Mousseau, 40 Minn. 236 , ; Mousseau v. Mousseau, 42 Minn. 212 , .

Mousseau v. Mousseau, 40 Minn. 236 , .

40 Minn. 236 , ( 41 N. W. Rep.