Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Lavallee v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co., 41 N.W. 974.

62 citing documents.

Gleason v. Geary 8 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1943
Gleason v. Geary 8 N.W.2d 808 Minn. 1943
Co. 40 Minn. 249 , 41 N.W.
Kellerman v. City of St. Paul 1 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1941
Kellerman v. City of St. Paul 1 N.W.2d 378 Minn. 1941
Wendt v. Wallace 240 N.W. 470 Minn. 1932
Wendt v. Wallace 240 N.W. 470 Minn. 1932
Co. 40 Minn. 249 , ; Jemming v. G. N. Ry.
State Ex Rel. Williams v. St. Paul Fire Department Relief Ass'n 222 N.W. 283 Minn. 1928
State Ex Rel. Williams v. St. Paul Fire Department Relief Ass'n 222 N.W. 283 Minn. 1928
Co. 40 Minn. 249 , , and many cases wherein that case is cited with approval.
Herr v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 191 N.W. 607 Minn. 1923
Herr v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 191 N.W. 607 Minn. 1923
Co. 40 Minn. 249 , ; Johnson v. St.
Seamer v. Great Northern Railway Co. 172 N.W. 765 Minn. 1919
Seamer v. Great Northern Railway Co. 172 N.W. 765 Minn. 1919
Co. 40 Minn. 249 , , down to Nylund v. Duluth & N. E. Ry.
State v. Moilen 167 N.W. 345 Minn. 1918
State v. Moilen 167 N.W. 345 Minn. 1918
Nylund v. Duluth & Northeastern Railway Co. 143 N.W. 739 Minn. 1913
Nylund v. Duluth & Northeastern Railway Co. 143 N.W. 739 Minn. 1913
Co. 40 Minn. 249 , ; and Johnson v. St.
Koecher v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 142 N.W. 874 Minn. 1913
Koecher v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co. 142 N.W. 874 Minn. 1913
Co. 40 Minn. 249 , , and in numerous subsequent, cases, that the basis for the classification of railway employees, should be the peculiar dangers and hazards incident to the operation of the road to which they are exposed and not the class of employees, to which the employee might belong, is expressly disapproved by the
Jelos v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 141 N.W. 843 Minn. 1913
Jelos v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. 141 N.W. 843 Minn. 1913
Co. 40 Minn. 249 , ; Johnson v. St.
Majavis v. Great Northern Railway Co. 141 N.W. 806 Minn. 1913
Majavis v. Great Northern Railway Co. 141 N.W. 806 Minn. 1913
Co. 40 Minn. 249 , ; Johnson v. St.
State ex rel. Young v. Standard Oil Co. 126 N.W. 527 Minn. 1910
State ex rel. Young v. Standard Oil Co. 126 N.W. 527 Minn. 1910
State ex rel. Mudeking v. Parr 123 N.W. 408 Minn. 1909
State ex rel. Mudeking v. Parr 123 N.W. 408 Minn. 1909
Co., 40 Minn. 249, 252 , ; State v. Ritt, 76 Minn. 531, 534 , ; Murray v. Board of Commrs.
Hanson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 121 N.W. 607 Minn. 1909
Hanson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co. 121 N.W. 607 Minn. 1909
Co., 40 Minn. 249 , ; Johnson v. St.
State ex rel. Board of Education v. Brown 106 N.W. 477 Minn. 1906
State ex rel. Board of Education v. Brown 106 N.W. 477 Minn. 1906
Co., 40 Minn. 249 , ; Johnson v. St.
Jemming v. Great Northern Railway Co. 104 N.W. 1079 Minn. 1905
Jemming v. Great Northern Railway Co. 104 N.W. 1079 Minn. 1905
Co., 40 Minn. 249 , , it was recognized "that such a reading would render the act unconstitutional as class legislation.
Swartz v. Great Northern Railway Co. 101 N.W. 504 Minn. 1904
Distinguished Swartz v. Great Northern Railway Co. 101 N.W. 504 Minn. 1904
Co., 40 Minn. 249 , , and Pearson v. Chicago, M. & St.
Kline v. Minnesota Iron Co. 100 N.W. 681 Minn. 1904
Kline v. Minnesota Iron Co. 100 N.W. 681 Minn. 1904
Co., 40 Minn. 249 , , where it was held that, if the statute be held to apply to railroad corporations, as such, it would be invalid and unconstitutional as class legislation, for it is beyond the power of the legislature to single out a particular class of employers, and impose upon them a distinct rule of liability for p
Schus v. Powers-Simpson Co. 85 Minn. 447 Minn. 1902
Schus v. Powers-Simpson Co. 85 Minn. 447 Minn. 1902
Co., 40 Minn. 249 , ; Mikkelson v. Truesdale, 63 Minn. 137 , ), the test in interpreting and construing this statute is not whether the corporation engaged in operating the.
O'Niel v. Great Northern Railway Co. 82 N.W. 1086 Minn. 1900
O'Niel v. Great Northern Railway Co. 82 N.W. 1086 Minn. 1900
Co., 40 Minn. 249 , ; Johnson v. St.
Weisel v. Eastern Railway Co. 82 N.W. 576 Minn. 1900
Weisel v. Eastern Railway Co. 82 N.W. 576 Minn. 1900
Co., 40 Minn. 249 , ; Johnson v. St.
Flynn v. Little Falls Electric & Water Co. 77 N.W. 38 Minn. 1898
Flynn v. Little Falls Electric & Water Co. 77 N.W. 38 Minn. 1898
Co., 40 Minn. 249 ; Cobb v. Bord, 40 Minn. 479 ; McCormick v. Village of West Duluth, 47 Minn. 272 ; Johnson v. St.
Cameron v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 65 N.W. 652 Minn. 1896
Cameron v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 65 N.W. 652 Minn. 1896
Paul, M. & M. R. Co., 40 Minn. 249 , .
State ex rel. Board of Courthouse & City Hall Com'rs v. Cooley 58 N.W. 150 Minn. 1893
State ex rel. Board of Courthouse & City Hall Com'rs v. Cooley 58 N.W. 150 Minn. 1893
Co., 40 Minn. 249 , ( ;) Johnson v. St.
Steffenson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co. 51 N.W. 610 Minn. 1892
Steffenson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co. 51 N.W. 610 Minn. 1892
Co., 40 Minn. 249 -252, ( 41 N. W. Rep.