Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Townshend v. Goodfellow, 41 N.W. 1056.
-
State Bank of Morristown v. Labs
275 N.W.2d 37
Minn. 1979
Rule 1, Rules of Civil Procedure, states that the rules “shall be construed to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive determination of every action.” The rules thus “reflect a well-considered policy to discourage technicalities and form.” Love v. Anderson, 240 *40 Minn. 312, 314
- Gittleman v. Fesenmaier 128 N.W.2d 709 Minn. 1964
-
Gittleman v. Fesenmaier
128 N.W.2d 709
Minn. 1964
1 Townshend v. Goodfellow, 40 Minn. 312, 314 , , 3 L. R. A. 739; Smith v. Kurtzenacker, 147 Minn. 398, 401 , ; Paynesville Land Co. v. Grabow, 160 Minn. 414, 420 , ; 6 Williston, Contracts (3 ed.) § 878; 3 American Law of Property, § 11.49, p. 141; 8A Thompson, Real Property, § 4487, p. 530; Restatem
- Miller v. Snedeker 101 N.W.2d 213 Minn. 1960
-
Miller v. Snedeker
101 N.W.2d 213
Minn. 1960
5 On marketability of title, see Townshend v. Goodfellow, 40 Minn. 312 , , 3 L. R. A. 739, 12 A. S. R. 736; Hedderly v. Johnson, supra; Austin v. Barnum, 52 Minn. 136 , ; Howe v. Coates, supra; Stacey v. Taylor, 196 Minn. 202 , ; Hubachek v. Maxbass Security Bank, 117 Minn. 163 , .
- Stacey v. Taylor 264 N.W. 809 Minn. 1936
-
Stacey v. Taylor
264 N.W. 809
Minn. 1936
In support they cited Townshend v. Goodfellow, 40 Minn. 312 , , 3 L. R. A. 739, 12 A. S. R. 736; Hedderly v. Johnson, 42 Minn. 443 , , 18 A. S. R. 521; Austin v. Barnum, 52 Minn. 136 , .
- Elder v. Elwell 220 N.W. 415 Minn. 1928
-
Elder v. Elwell
220 N.W. 415
Minn. 1928
In Townshend v. Goodfellow, 40 Minn. 312 , , 3 L. R. A. 739, 12 A. S. R. 736, it Avas held that the rule of the Goetz and Benedict cases was applicable only where a party had no interest in the lands which he agreed to convey, but volunteered to enter a contract as a mere venture.
- Paynesville Land Co. v. Grabow 200 N.W. 481 Minn. 1924
-
Paynesville Land Co. v. Grabow
200 N.W. 481
Minn. 1924
Townshend v. Goodfellow, 40 Minn. 312 , , *420 3 L. R. A. 739, 12 Am.
- Seerup v. Goraczkowski 199 N.W. 94 Minn. 1924
-
Seerup v. Goraczkowski
199 N.W. 94
Minn. 1924
Townshend v. Goodfellow, 40 Minn. 312 , , 3 L. R. A. 739, 12 Am.
- Smith v. Kurtzenacker 180 N.W. 243 Minn. 1920
-
Smith v. Kurtzenacker
180 N.W. 243
Minn. 1920
Co. 126 Minn. 72 , ; Loveridge v. Coles, 72 Minn. 57 , ; Townsend v. Goodfellow, 40 Minn. 312 , , 3 L.R.A.
- Shraiberg v. Hanson 163 N.W. 1032 Minn. 1917
-
Shraiberg v. Hanson
163 N.W. 1032
Minn. 1917
Co. v. Wilson, 25 Minn. 382 ; Smith v. Lytle, 27 Minn. 184 , ; Randall v. Constans, 33 Minn. 329 , ; Townshend v. Goodfellow, 40 Minn. 312 , , 3 L.R.A.
- Wellington v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. 144 N.W. 222 Minn. 1913
-
Wellington v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.
144 N.W. 222
Minn. 1913
Co. v. Wilson, 25 Minn. 382 ; Smith v. Lytle, 27 Minn. 184 , ; Randall v. Constans, 33 Minn. 329 , ; Niggeler v. Maurin, 34 Minn. 118 , ; Townshend v. Goodfellow, 40 Minn. 312 , , 3 L.R.A.
- Schlemmer v. Nelson 142 N.W. 1041 Minn. 1913
-
Schlemmer v. Nelson
142 N.W. 1041
Minn. 1913
Townshend v. Goodfellow, 40 Minn. 312 , , 3 L.R.A.
- Kasal v. Hlinka 136 N.W. 569 Minn. 1912
-
Kasal v. Hlinka
136 N.W. 569
Minn. 1912
Townshend v. Goodfellow, 40 Minn. 312 , .
- Howe v. Coates 107 N.W. 397 Minn. 1906
-
Howe v. Coates
107 N.W. 397
Minn. 1906
Townshend v. Goodfellow, 40 Minn. 312 , ; Heller v. Cohen, 154 N. Y. 299 ; Fleming v. Burnham, 100 N. Y. 1 , 2 N. E. 905 ; Brokaw v. Duffy, 165 N. Y. 391 , 59 N. E. 196 .
- Duluth Loan & Land Co. v. Klovdahl 56 N.W. 1119 Minn. 1893
- Brown v. Jones 55 N.W. 54 Minn. 1893
- Austin v. Barnum 53 N.W. 1132 Minn. 1892
-
Austin v. Barnum
53 N.W. 1132
Minn. 1892
396, cited with approval in Townshencl v. Goodfellow, 40 Minn. 312 , ( 41 N. W. Rep.
- Richmond v. Koenig 45 N.W. 1093 Minn. 1890
-
Richmond v. Koenig
45 N.W. 1093
Minn. 1890
In Townshend v. Goodfellow, 40 Minn. 312 , ( 41 N. W. Rep.
- Menage v. Burke 45 N.W. 155 Minn. 1890
-
Menage v. Burke
45 N.W. 155
Minn. 1890
364 ;) Townshend v. Goodfellow, 40 Minn. 312 , ( 41 N. W. Rep.
- Brown v. Munger 44 N.W. 519 Minn. 1890
-
Brown v. Munger
44 N.W. 519
Minn. 1890
Townshend v. Goodfellow, 40 Minn. 312 , ( 41 N. W. Rep.
- Hedderly v. Johnson 44 N.W. 527 Minn. 1890
-
Hedderly v. Johnson
44 N.W. 527
Minn. 1890
An instance in which the fact, and the evidence by which it would have to be established, were of such a character as to render a title depending on the fact reasonably doubtful, is furnished by Townshend v. Goodfellow, 40 Minn. 312 , ( 41 N. W. Rep.
- Gregory v. Christian 44 N.W. 202 Minn. 1890
-
Gregory v. Christian
44 N.W. 202
Minn. 1890
Townshend v. Goodfellow, 40 Minn. 312 , ( 41 N. W. Rep.
- Fairchild v. Marshall 43 N.W. 563 Minn. 1889
-
Fairchild v. Marshall
43 N.W. 563
Minn. 1889
Townshend v. Goodfellow, 40 Minn. 312 , ( 41 N. W. Rep.