cl-8011097 Precedential Affirmed Processed

Reitan v. Goebel

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed May 1, 1889 · 42 N.W. 394

Cited by

Distinguished in 1

Swanson v. Domning 86 N.W.2d 716 Minn. 1957
Bernstein v. Levitz 16 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 1944
McDermott v. Ralich 247 N.W. 683 Minn. 1933
Robie v. Holdahl 230 N.W. 641 Minn. 1930
Smith v. Vosika 203 N.W. 428 Minn. 1925
Independent Harvester Co. v. Malzohn 179 N.W. 727 Minn. 1920
Roseberry v. Hart-Parr Co. 176 N.W. 175 Minn. 1920
Nelson v. Berkner 166 N.W. 347 Minn. 1918
Arcade Investment Co. v. Hawley 165 N.W. 477 Minn. 1917
Bigelow v. Barnes 140 N.W. 1032 Minn. 1913
Cox v. Edwards 139 N.W. 1070 Minn. 1913
Olson v. Smith 134 N.W. 117 Minn. 1912

Opinion text

By the Court. The only question presented upon this appeal is as to whether the evidence justified the determination of the jury that, at the time of the execution of the. bond upon which this action is brought, the defendant Goebel had property which might have been *409 seized and appropriated to the satisfaction of a judgment which the plaintiff had recovered against her. An examination of the record satisfies ns that the evidence was sufficient, and that the order refusing a new trial should be affirmed. Ordered accordingly.