Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Keller v. Carr, 42 N.W. 292.

21 citing documents.

  • S. M. Hentges & Sons, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    “Evidence of extrinsic facts and circumstances” may not “supplement a manifestly incomplete [writing] by proving the description by parol.”
  • Estate of Peterson 579 N.W.2d 488 Minn. Ct. App. 1998
    In Taylor v. Allen, 40 Minn. 433, 433 , the supreme court considered whether the written memorandum of a contract for the sale of land was sufficient to satisfy the requirements of the statute of frauds.
  • Krause Ex Relo. Krause v. Mutual Service Casualty Co. 399 N.W.2d 597 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
  • Krause Ex Relo. Krause v. Mutual Service Casualty Co. 399 N.W.2d 597 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
    In its memorandum, the trial court stated: *601 Residence is an act, Keller v. Carr, 40 Minn. 428 , 42 N.W.
  • Malevich v. Hakola 278 N.W.2d 541 Minn. 1979
    Taylor v. Allen, 40 Minn. 433
  • Radke v. Brenon 134 N.W.2d 887 Minn. 1965
    8 Doyle v. Wohlrabe, supra; Holste v. Baker, 223 Minn. 321 , 26 N. W. (2d) 473 ; Taylor v. Allen, 40 Minn. 433 , .
  • Colstad v. Levine 67 N.W.2d 648 Minn. 1954
    3 Taylor v. Allen, 40 Minn. 433 , .
  • Doyle v. Wohlrabe 66 N.W.2d 757 Minn. 1954
    2 See, The Gregory Co. v. Shapiro, 125 Minn. 81 , ; Swallow v. Strong, 83 Minn. 87 , ; Taylor v. Allen, 40 Minn. 433 , ; Quinn v. Champagne, 38 Minn. 322 , ; Tice v. Freeman, 30 Minn. 389 , ; Restatement, Contracts, § 207; 2 Corbin, Contracts, § 505; Annotation, 23 A. L. R. (2d) 6; 49 Am.
  • Hughes v. Lucker 46 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 1951
  • Hughes v. Lucker 46 N.W.2d 497 Minn. 1951
    Chapman v. Davis, supra; see, Keller v. Carr, 40 Minn. 428 , ; Rawstorne v. Maguire, 265 N. Y. 204, 208 , 192 N. E. 294, 296 ; cf. 17 Am.
  • Chapman v. Davis 45 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1951
  • Chapman v. Davis 45 N.W.2d 822 Minn. 1951
    13 Keller v. Carr, 40 Minn. 428 , .
  • Nelson v. Sandkamp 34 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1948
  • Nelson v. Sandkamp 34 N.W.2d 640 Minn. 1948
    Keller v. Carr, 40 Minn. 428 , Town of Albion v. Village of Maple Lake, 71 Minn. 503 , ; Restatement, Conflict of Laws, § 9.
  • Kris v. Pattison 198 N.W. 541 Minn. 1924
    Taylor v. Allen, 40 Minn. 433 , .
  • Thompson v. Peterson 142 N.W. 307 Minn. 1913
  • Thompson v. Peterson 142 N.W. 307 Minn. 1913
    Keller v. Carr, 40 Minn. 428 , ; Lawson v. Adlard, 46 Minn. 243 , ; 24 Am.
  • Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Co. v. Norris 63 N.W. 634 Minn. 1895
  • Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Co. v. Norris 63 N.W. 634 Minn. 1895
    Keller v. Carr, 40 Minn. 428 , .
  • Lawson v. Adlard 48 N.W. 1019 Minn. 1891
  • Lawson v. Adlard 48 N.W. 1019 Minn. 1891
    This subject has been discussed, very recently, in Keller v. Carr, 40 Minn. 428 , ( 42 N. W. Rep.