cl-8011136 Precedential Affirmed Processed

Subke v. Eckes

Minnesota Supreme Court · Filed May 21, 1889 · 42 N.W. 696

Cited by

Kessler v. Kruidenier 219 N.W. 552 Minn. 1928
Slocum v. Bracy 56 N.W. 826 Minn. 1893
Reynolds v. Franklin 43 N.W. 53 Minn. 1889
Murphin v. Scovell 43 N.W. 1 Minn. 1889

Opinion text

Collins, J. The finding of fact complained of and alleged to be erroneous by the appellant was fully warranted by the testimony, and abundantly justified by the circumstances as presented upon the trial. No other question being involved, the order denying a new trial is affirmed.