Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Jacoby v. Parkland Distilling Co., 43 N.W. 52.

26 citing documents.

In Re Haggerty 448 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 1989
In Re Haggerty 448 N.W.2d 363 Minn. 1989
41 Minn. 227, 231 , 43 N.W.
In Re Tveten 402 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 1987
In Re Tveten 402 N.W.2d 551 Minn. 1987
Jacoby v. Parkland Distilling Co., 41 Minn. 227, 229-30 , 43 N.W.
Argonaut Insurance Co. v. Cooper 261 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1978
Argonaut Insurance Co. v. Cooper 261 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1978
In rejecting this assertion, the trial court relied upon Jacoby v. Parkland Distilling Co., 41 Minn. 227 , 43 N.W.
O'BRIEN v. Johnson 148 N.W.2d 357 Minn. 1967
O'BRIEN v. Johnson 148 N.W.2d 357 Minn. 1967
4 The rule *309 was applied and followed as early as Jacoby v. Parkland Distilling Co. 41 Minn. 227 , , where the debtor’s wife sought a judgment declaring the claims of creditors not to be a lien on their homestead.
Wilson v. First National Bank 60 N.W.2d 69 Minn. 1953
Wilson v. First National Bank 60 N.W.2d 69 Minn. 1953
Co. 134 Minn. 478 , ; Jacoby v. Parkland Distilling Co. 41 Minn. 227 , ; Umland v. Holcombe, 26 Minn. 286 , ; 3 Dunnell, Dig.
Cysewski v. Steingraber 24 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 1946
Cysewski v. Steingraber 24 N.W.2d 266 Minn. 1946
* * * * * * * “We therefore hold that there was no change in the policy of our homestead law by the revision of 1905, and that the same must be measured by area, and not by the uses or purposes to which the property may be devoted, other than residence purposes.” See, also, Kelly v. Baker, 10 Minn. 124 (154); Umland v. Holcombe, 26 Minn. 286 , ; Jacoby v. Parkland Distilling *227 Co. 41 Minn. 227 , ; National Bank v. Banholzer, 69 Minn. 24 , .
Nash v. Bengtson 228 N.W. 177 Minn. 1929
Nash v. Bengtson 228 N.W. 177 Minn. 1929
However the facts in this case do not bring defendants within that rule, as an examination of the following authorities cited by defendants will disclose: Stricker v. Trullinger, 172 Minn. 547 , ; Jacoby v. Parkland Distilling Co. 41 Minn. 227 , ; (see Small v. Anderson, 139 Minn. 292 , ; Kangas v. Robie (C. C. A.) 264 F. 92 ); Forsberg v. Security State Bank (C. C. A.) 15 F. (2d) 499, 49 A. L. R. 913; and State Bank of Round Lake v. Riley, 176 Minn. 550 , .
Stricker v. Trullinger 216 N.W. 231 Minn. 1927
Stricker v. Trullinger 216 N.W. 231 Minn. 1927
See cases of Jacoby v. *549 Parkland Distilling Co. 41 Minn. 227 , , and Forsberg v. Security State Bank (C. C. A.) 15 F. (2d) 499, 49 A. L. R. 913, and note to Ferguson v. Little Rock Tr.
Schlecht v. Schlecht 209 N.W. 883 Minn. 1926
Schlecht v. Schlecht 209 N.W. 883 Minn. 1926
In Jacoby v. Parkland Distilling Co. 41 Minn. 227 , , it was held that a debtor who uses his nonexempt assets in securing a homestead takes nothing from his credittors which the law secures to them or in which they have any valid right, and that, even if he disposes of his property subject to execution for the very purpose of converting the proceeds into
Gale v. Hopkins 206 N.W. 164 Minn. 1925
Gale v. Hopkins 206 N.W. 164 Minn. 1925
Jacoby v. Parkland Distilling Co. 41 Minn. 227 , ; Phelps v. Northern Trust Co. 70 Minn. 546 , ; Lockey v. Lockey, 112 Minn. 512 , ; Stauning v. Crookston Merc.
Small v. Anderson 166 N.W. 340 Minn. 1918
Small v. Anderson 166 N.W. 340 Minn. 1918
She relies in support thereof upon the rule stated and applied in Jacoby v. Parkland Distilling Co. 41 Minn. 227 , .
Lockey v. Lockey 128 N.W. 833 Minn. 1910
Lockey v. Lockey 128 N.W. 833 Minn. 1910
Kelly v. Baker, 10 Minn. 124 (154); Umland v. Holcombe, 26 Minn. 286 , ; Jacoby v. Parkland Distilling Co., 41 Minn. 227 , ; National Bank of the Republic v. Banholzer, 69 Minn. 24 , .
National Bank of Republic of New York v. Banholzer 71 N.W. 919 Minn. 1897
National Bank of Republic of New York v. Banholzer 71 N.W. 919 Minn. 1897
Kelly v. Baker, 10 Minn. 124 (154); Umland v. Holcombe, 26 Minn. 286 , ; Jacoby v. Parkland, 41 Minn. 227 , .