Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hospes v. Northwestern Manufacturing & Car Co., 43 N.W. 180.

49 citing documents.

In re the Voluntary Dissolution of Amitad, Inc. 400 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In re the Voluntary Dissolution of Amitad, Inc. 400 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
See Hospes v. Northwestern Manufacturing & Car Co., 41 Minn. 256, 258-59 , 43 N.W.
Northwestern State Bank v. Foss 177 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 1970
Northwestern State Bank v. Foss 177 N.W.2d 292 Minn. 1970
& Car Co. 41 Minn. 256, 261 , .
Zywiec v. City of South St. Paul 47 N.W.2d 465 Minn. 1951
Zywiec v. City of South St. Paul 47 N.W.2d 465 Minn. 1951
& Car Co. 41 Minn. 256, 261 , , speaking through Mr. Justice Mitchell, we said: “* * * This court is always desirous that appeals should be determined if possible on their merits; but to enable us to do so *31 they must he brought here in a proper way, and with some regard to orderly practice.” That is as true today as it
Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Brown 232 N.W. 740 Minn. 1930
Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co. v. Brown 232 N.W. 740 Minn. 1930
Radel v. Radel, 123 Minn. 299 , ; Hospes v. N. W. M. & C. Co. 41 Minn. 256 , ; Murphy v. Holterhoff, 72 Minn. 98 , ; Fred v. Segal, 122 Minn. 43 , .
Thoreson v. Quinn 147 N.W. 716 Minn. 1914
Thoreson v. Quinn 147 N.W. 716 Minn. 1914
& Car Co. 41 Minn. 256 , ; Dow v. Northern Land & Loan Co. 51 Minn. 326 , ; Hendrickson v. Back, 74 Minn. 90 , ; Spurr v. Spurr, 108 Minn. 521 , .
Radel v. Radel 143 N.W. 741 Minn. 1913
Radel v. Radel 143 N.W. 741 Minn. 1913
This rule was laid down in 1889 in Hospes v. Northwestern Manufacturing & Car Co. 41 Minn. 256 , , and has been consistently followed in a large number of cases ever since.
Fred v. Segal 141 N.W. 806 Minn. 1913
Fred v. Segal 141 N.W. 806 Minn. 1913
& C. Co. 41 Minn. 256 , ; Spurr v. Spurr, 108 Minn. 521 , ; Purvis v. Roholt, 95 Minn. 502 , ; Murphy v. Holterhoff, 72 Minn. 98 , .
Spurr v. Spurr 121 N.W. 121 Minn. 1909
Spurr v. Spurr 121 N.W. 121 Minn. 1909
& Car Co., 41 Minn. 256 , , that the order appealed from must be, and is, affirmed.
Peterson v. Storm 104 N.W. 894 Minn. 1905
Peterson v. Storm 104 N.W. 894 Minn. 1905
& Car Co., 41 Minn. 256, 261 , .
Purvis v. Roholt 104 N.W. 551 Minn. 1905
Purvis v. Roholt 104 N.W. 551 Minn. 1905
& Car Co., 41 Minn. 256 , .
McElrath v. Board of Supervisors 99 N.W. 895 Minn. 1904
McElrath v. Board of Supervisors 99 N.W. 895 Minn. 1904
& Car Co., 41 Minn. 256 , , which has been constantly adhered to.
Murphy v. Holterhoff 75 N.W. 4 Minn. 1898
Murphy v. Holterhoff 75 N.W. 4 Minn. 1898
The return is clearly defective, under the rule laid down in Hospes v. Northwestern M. & C. Co., 41 Minn. 256 , , and frequently applied in later cases.
Parker v. Bradford 71 N.W. 619 Minn. 1897
Parker v. Bradford 71 N.W. 619 Minn. 1897
Hospes v. Northwestern, 41 Minn. 256 , ; Du Toit v. Fergestad, 55 Minn. 462 , .
Gardner v. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'n 69 N.W. 895 Minn. 1897
Gardner v. Fidelity Mutual Life Ass'n 69 N.W. 895 Minn. 1897
The rule upon this subject, laid down in Hospes v. Northwestern M. & C. Co., 41 Minn. 256 , , and several other later cases, is directly in point here.
Schultz v. Bower 68 N.W. 1080 Minn. 1896
Schultz v. Bower 68 N.W. 1080 Minn. 1896
Hospes v. Northwestern M. & C. Co., 41 Minn. 256 , .
Brown v. Union Depot Street Railway & Transfer Co. 68 N.W. 107 Minn. 1896
Brown v. Union Depot Street Railway & Transfer Co. 68 N.W. 107 Minn. 1896
This was settled in Hospes v. Northwestern M. & C. Co., 41 Minn. 256 , .
Firth v. Brack 66 N.W. 987 Minn. 1896
Firth v. Brack 66 N.W. 987 Minn. 1896
Under the rule laid down in Hospes v. Northwestern, M. & C. Co., 41 Minn. 256 , , the objection is well taken, and the order appealed from should be affirmed.
Freeman v. Children's Endowment Society 65 N.W. 626 Minn. 1896
Freeman v. Children's Endowment Society 65 N.W. 626 Minn. 1896
& Car Co., 41 Minn. 250 , .
Seibert v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co. 59 N.W. 829 Minn. 1894
Seibert v. Minneapolis & St. Louis Ry. Co. 59 N.W. 829 Minn. 1894
& Car Co., 41 Minn. 256 , ( ,) make the point that the record brought up on these appeals is so deficient that it does not appear on what the court acted in making its order, or what the whole of that order was.
Taylor v. Hess 58 N.W. 824 Minn. 1894
Taylor v. Hess 58 N.W. 824 Minn. 1894
§ 109 et seq.; Hosford v. Rowe, *100 41 Minn. 245 , ( ;) Fellows v. Smith, 130 Mass. 378 .
Du Toit v. Fergestad 57 N.W. 204 Minn. 1893
Du Toit v. Fergestad 57 N.W. 204 Minn. 1893
Hospes v. Northwestern M. & C. Co., 41 Minn. 256 , ( .)
Dow v. Northern Land & Loan Co. 53 N.W. 649 Minn. 1892
Dow v. Northern Land & Loan Co. 53 N.W. 649 Minn. 1892
& Car Co., 41 Minn. 256 , ( 43 N. W. Rep.
Nelson v. Jenks 52 N.W. 1081 Minn. 1892
Brown v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co. 46 N.W. 560 Minn. 1890
Brown v. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co. 46 N.W. 560 Minn. 1890
& Car Co., 41 Minn. 256 , ( 43 N. W. Rep.
Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co. v. Langdon 46 N.W. 310 Minn. 1890
Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co. v. Langdon 46 N.W. 310 Minn. 1890
In May, 1884, in an action commenced by Hospes, one of its creditors, ( 41 Minn. 256 , 43 N. W. Rep.