Kimball v. Jones
Cited by
- Dwinnell v. Oftedahl 51 N.W.2d 93 Minn. 1952
- Poznanovic v. Maki 296 N.W. 415 Minn. 1941
- Investors Syndicate v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. 223 N.W. 139 Minn. 1929
- Standard Oil Co. v. Day 201 N.W. 410 Minn. 1924
- Whitney v. Welnitz 190 N.W. 57 Minn. 1922
- Edberg v. Johnson 184 N.W. 12 Minn. 1921
- L. J. Mueller Furnace Co. v. Burkhart 182 N.W. 909 Minn. 1921
- Villaume Box & Lumber Co. v. Condon 178 N.W. 492 Minn. 1920
- American Bridge Co. v. Honstain 128 N.W. 1014 Minn. 1910
- Shadewald v. Phillips 75 N.W. 717 Minn. 1898
- Board of County Commissioners v. Citizens' Bank 69 N.W. 912 Minn. 1897
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Allen v. Coates 29 Minn. 46
Opinion text
Vanderburgh, J. In Allen v. Coates, 29 Minn. 46 , ( 11 N. W. Rep. 132 ,) this court held a light open buggy exempt from execution under our statutes, and the rule is stated generally, without any restriction or limitation in respect to the character or style of the vehicle, or the particular uses to which it might be applied by the debtor. That case governs this. In this case the “wagon” claimed to be exempt is a light two-seated carriage, used by the debtor “in riding to and from his work.” He may, however, at any time, find it for his interest to put it to other practical and useful purposes. It is manifest that, under the general language of the statute, any attempt to make the limitations insisted upon in this case in its construction would lead to much uncertainty and confusion in practice, each case depending upon its own peculiar facts, and leaving the rule doubtful and unsatisfactory. Order affirmed.'