DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Martin v. Hill, 43 N.W. 337.

29 citing documents.

  • Dwinnell v. Oftedahl 51 N.W.2d 93 Minn. 1952
  • Dwinnell v. Oftedahl 51 N.W.2d 93 Minn. 1952
    See, Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , ; Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , ; Drake v. Fairmont Drain Tile & Brick Co. 129 Minn. 145 , Jacobson v. C. M. & St.
  • Dale v. First National Bank of Rushmore 227 N.W. 501 Minn. 1929
  • Dale v. First National Bank of Rushmore 227 N.W. 501 Minn. 1929
    (2 ed.) § 1202; Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , ; McCarty v. New York L. Ins.
  • Becker v. Bundy 225 N.W. 290 Minn. 1929
  • Becker v. Bundy 225 N.W. 290 Minn. 1929
    “It would be the grossest injustice to hold a party to a purchase, where, solely through the fault of the other party, he gets only what he did not intend to buy.” Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337, 338 , .
  • Saupe v. St. Paul Trust Co. 212 N.W. 892 Minn. 1927
  • Saupe v. St. Paul Trust Co. 212 N.W. 892 Minn. 1927
    Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , ; Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , ; Drake v. Fairmont D. T. & B. Co. 129 Minn. 145 , ; Fawkes v. Knapp, 138 Minn. 384 , ; Labar v. Lindstrom, 158 Minn. 453 , ; Kirby v. Dean, 159 Minn. 451 , .
  • Hirschman v. Healy 202 N.W. 734 Minn. 1925
  • Hirschman v. Healy 202 N.W. 734 Minn. 1925
    Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , ; MacLaren v. Cochran, 44 Minn. 255 , ; Knappen v. Freeman, 47 Minn. 491 , ; Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , ; Fawkes v. Scott, 138 Minn. 384 , ; Kirby v. Dean, 159 Minn. 451 , .
  • Snortum v. Snortum 193 N.W. 304 Minn. 1923
  • Cafferty v. Klatt 179 N.W. 1002 Minn. 1920
  • Cafferty v. Klatt 179 N.W. 1002 Minn. 1920
    Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , .
  • Fawkes v. Knapp 165 N.W. 236 Minn. 1917
  • Fawkes v. Knapp 165 N.W. 236 Minn. 1917
    Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , ; MacLaren v. Cockran, 44 Minn. 255 , ; Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , ; Ludowese v. Amidon, 124 Minn. 288 , .
  • Kempf v. Ranger 155 N.W. 1059 Minn. 1916
  • Kempf v. Ranger 155 N.W. 1059 Minn. 1916
    The law on this subject will be found fully discussed in Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , ; Pennington v. Eoberge, 122 Minn. 295 , , and Drake v. Fairmont D. T. & B. Co. 129 Minn. 145 , .
  • Drake v. Fairmont Drain Tile & Brick Co. 151 N.W. 914 Minn. 1915
  • Drake v. Fairmont Drain Tile & Brick Co. 151 N.W. 914 Minn. 1915
    We think tbe question has been determined in tbis state by Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , , an action to rescind tbe purchase of shares of stock because induced by false representations.
  • Ludowese v. Amidon 144 N.W. 965 Minn. 1914
  • Ludowese v. Amidon 144 N.W. 965 Minn. 1914
    Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , ; MacLaren v. Cochran, 44 Minn. 255 , ; Knappen v. Freeman, 47 Minn. 491 , ; Nelson v. Carlson, 54 Minn. 90 , ; Pennington v. Roberge, 122 Minn. 295 , .
  • Pennington v. Roberge 142 N.W. 710 Minn. 1913
  • Pennington v. Roberge 142 N.W. 710 Minn. 1913
    The right of rescission “is not based upon actual fraud, but on a material mistake of facts caused by the fault of the other party” Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , .
  • Schmeisser v. Albinson 138 N.W. 775 Minn. 1912
  • Schmeisser v. Albinson 138 N.W. 775 Minn. 1912
    That such is the holding of this court appears from Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , , and in Berkey v. Judd, 22 Minn. 287 , where it is said “that fraud is never to be presumed, but must be proved, yet this rule does not require direct, positive proof in all cases, but is satisfied if the facts •and circumstances surrounding the alleged fraudulent transaction are such as reasonably poi
  • McCarty v. New York Life Insurance 77 N.W. 426 Minn. 1898
  • McCarty v. New York Life Insurance 77 N.W. 426 Minn. 1898
    See Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337 , .
  • MacLaren v. Cochran 46 N.W. 408 Minn. 1890
  • MacLaren v. Cochran 46 N.W. 408 Minn. 1890
    Bee, also, Martin v. Hill, 41 Minn. 337, 343 , ( 43 N. W. Rep.