Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kettle River Railroad v. Eastern Railway Co., 43 N.W. 469.

27 citing documents.

Minn. 2023
Co., (acknowledging that the granting of an exclusive right of way for railroad purposes to a party and its successors or assigns was “in derogation of common right, [and] should receive a strict construction”).
Federated Retail Holdings, Inc. v. County of Ramsey 820 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 2012
Federated Retail Holdings, Inc. v. County of Ramsey 820 N.W.2d 553 Minn. 2012
Co., 41 Minn. 461, 471-72 , 43 N.W.
Matter of Turners Crossroad Development Co. 277 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1979
Matter of Turners Crossroad Development Co. 277 N.W.2d 364 Minn. 1979
See, Kettle River Railroad v. Eastern Railway, 41 Minn. 461, 471 , 43 N.W.
Lund v. Village of Princeton 85 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1957
Lund v. Village of Princeton 85 N.W.2d 197 Minn. 1957
Co. 41 Minn. 461 , , 6 L. R. A. 111; Lone Star Gas Co. v. Municipal Gas Co. 117 Tex.
Burger v. City of St. Paul 64 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1954
Burger v. City of St. Paul 64 N.W.2d 73 Minn. 1954
Co. 41 Minn. 461 , , 6 L. R. A. 111; Ludgate v. Somerville, 121 Ore.
Pelser v. Gingold 8 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1943
Pelser v. Gingold 8 N.W.2d 36 Minn. 1943
Co. 41 Minn. 461 , , 6 L. R. A. 111, where the grantee covenanted for the exclusive transportation by a particular railway of the products of a stone quarry on the land granted.
Anderson v. Otter Tail Power Co. 220 N.W. 404 Minn. 1928
Anderson v. Otter Tail Power Co. 220 N.W. 404 Minn. 1928
Co. 41 Minn. 461, 473 , , 6 L. R. A. 111, the court says: “There is a growing tendency to incorporate equitable doctrines with common law rules, and, in equity, covenants relating to land, or its mode of use or enjoyment, are frequently enforced against subsequent grantees with notice, though there is no privity of estate
Northern Trust Co. v. Consolidated Elevator Co. 171 N.W. 265 Minn. 1919
Northern Trust Co. v. Consolidated Elevator Co. 171 N.W. 265 Minn. 1919
Co. 41 Minn. 461, 476 , , 6 L.R.A.
State v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 131 N.W. 859 Minn. 1911
State v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. 131 N.W. 859 Minn. 1911
Co. of Minn. 41 Minn. 461 , , 6 L.R.A.
Clement v. Willett 117 N.W. 491 Minn. 1908
Clement v. Willett 117 N.W. 491 Minn. 1908
Co., 41 Minn. 461 , , 6 L. R. A. 111.
Sjoblom v. Mark 114 N.W. 746 Minn. 1908
Sjoblom v. Mark 114 N.W. 746 Minn. 1908
Co. of Minn., 41 Minn. 461 , , 6 L. R. A. 111.
Jellison v. Halloran 46 N.W. 332 Minn. 1890
Jellison v. Halloran 46 N.W. 332 Minn. 1890
Co., 41 Minn. 461, 473 , ( 43 N. W. Rep.
Chicago, Burlington & Northern Railroad v. Porter 46 N.W. 75 Minn. 1890
Chicago, Burlington & Northern Railroad v. Porter 46 N.W. 75 Minn. 1890
Co., 41 Minn. 461 , ( 43 N. W. Rep.
Miller v. Fasler 44 N.W. 256 Minn. 1890
Miller v. Fasler 44 N.W. 256 Minn. 1890
Co., 41 Minn. 461 , ( 43 N. W. Rep.